On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 01:55:52PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 08:09:42AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > > - removed the .resume hook as upstream changed suspend/resume hooks and there
> > > >   is no need in the end to re-enable host notify on resume (tested on Lenovo
> > > >   t440 and t450).
> > > 
> > > Actually, this hook seemed to be required on the Lenovo T440 (Haswell)
> > > but not on the T450 (Broadwell) laptop I have now here.
> > > 
> > > Wolfram, I can resend the whole series or a follow-up patch to re-enable
> > > after resume Host Notify. How do you prefer I deal with that?
> > 
> > That depends a little how we want to handle patch 4. I am going to apply
> > patches 1+2 today to my tree. Then you can just resend patch 3 which I
> > hope will get some review soon, but I will pick it up for 4.8 later
> > nonetheless. If it is not causing too much dependency hassle, I'd prefer
> > that patch 4 goes via Dmitry's input tree.
> 
> Any chance I could get a stable branch with these 2 patches based on 4.6
> so that I can pull it and merge the #4? This way we do not need to wait
> for 2 releases to merge everything...

Sure.

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/host-notify

Thanks,

   Wolfram