From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Milo Kim <milo.kim@ti.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@google.com>,
Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>,
Stephen Barber <smbarber@chromium.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
Ajit Pal Singh <ajitpal.singh@st.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@gmail.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>,
kernel@stlinux.com, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/14] regulator: pwm: Switch to the atomic PWM API
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 16:30:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160705143040.GX6247@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465895602-31008-11-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 283 bytes --]
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:13:18AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Use the atomic API wherever appropriate and get rid of pwm_apply_args()
> call (the reference period and polarity are now explicitly set when
> calling pwm_apply_state()).
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-05 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-14 9:13 [PATCH v3 00/14] regulator: pwm: various improvements Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] pwm: Add an helper to prepare a new PWM state Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] pwm: Add two helpers to ease relative duty cycle manipulation Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] pwm: rockchip: Fix period and duty_cycle approximation Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] pwm: rockchip: Add support for hardware readout Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] pwm: rockchip: Avoid glitches on already running PWMs Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] pwm: rockchip: Add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] pwm: sti: Add support for hardware readout Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] pwm: sti: Avoid glitches on already running PWMs Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] regulator: pwm: Adjust PWM config at probe time Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] regulator: pwm: Switch to the atomic PWM API Boris Brezillon
2016-07-05 14:30 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] regulator: pwm: Properly initialize the ->state field Boris Brezillon
2016-07-05 14:31 ` Mark Brown
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] regulator: pwm: Retrieve correct voltage Boris Brezillon
2016-07-05 14:32 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-08 15:43 ` Thierry Reding
2016-07-09 9:47 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-11 7:02 ` Thierry Reding
2016-07-11 7:20 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-07-11 16:53 ` Doug Anderson
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] regulator: pwm: Support extra continuous mode cases Boris Brezillon
2016-07-05 14:34 ` Mark Brown
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] regulator: pwm: Document pwm-dutycycle-unit and pwm-dutycycle-range Boris Brezillon
2016-06-16 22:26 ` Rob Herring
2016-07-05 14:36 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-08 16:35 ` [PATCH v3 00/14] regulator: pwm: various improvements Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160705143040.GX6247@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=ajitpal.singh@st.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@google.com \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=kernel@stlinux.com \
--cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@st.com \
--cc=milo.kim@ti.com \
--cc=patrice.chotard@st.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=smbarber@chromium.org \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@gmail.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=wxt@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).