From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@majess.pl>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Lothar Wassmann <LW@karo-electronics.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] pwm: imx: Rewrite imx_pwm_*_v1 code to facilitate switch to atomic pwm operation
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 08:27:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161025082737.2ecc9fe4@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161025055454.emytytmcg6d23jdd@pengutronix.de>
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 07:54:54 +0200
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:45:41PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > The code has been rewritten to remove "generic" calls to
> > imx_pwm_{enable|disable|config}.
> >
> > Such approach would facilitate switch to atomic PWM (a.k.a ->apply())
> > implementation.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
> > Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@majess.pl>
> > ---
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> > index c37d223..83e43d5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> > @@ -66,8 +66,6 @@ struct imx_chip {
> > static int imx_pwm_config_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> > struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns)
> > {
> > - struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip);
> > -
> > /*
> > * The PWM subsystem allows for exact frequencies. However,
> > * I cannot connect a scope on my device to the PWM line and
> > @@ -85,26 +83,52 @@ static int imx_pwm_config_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> > * both the prescaler (/1 .. /128) and then by CLKSEL
> > * (/2 .. /16).
> > */
> > + struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip);
> > u32 max = readl(imx->mmio_base + MX1_PWMP);
> > u32 p = max * duty_ns / period_ns;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_ipg);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > writel(max - p, imx->mmio_base + MX1_PWMS);
> >
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_ipg);
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static void imx_pwm_set_enable_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool enable)
> > +static int imx_pwm_enable_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> > {
> > struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip);
> > + int ret;
> > u32 val;
> >
> > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_ipg);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > val = readl(imx->mmio_base + MX1_PWMC);
> > + val |= MX1_PWMC_EN;
> > + writel(val, imx->mmio_base + MX1_PWMC);
> >
> > - if (enable)
> > - val |= MX1_PWMC_EN;
> > - else
> > - val &= ~MX1_PWMC_EN;
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per);
>
> This looks wrong. You start by enabling clk_ipg which is needed for
> register access, but then end with disabling clk_per which is needed for
> driving the actual PWM output. This function should probably enable
> clk_per on entry and enable clk_ipg while accessing registers.
Oh, I didn't notice there was 2 different clocks here. This probably
means you have to enable clk_ipg when manipulating the registers in
->disable().
One question, if there's a separate clk for the registers, why don't we
leave this clock enabled, and disable it in ->suspend() or ->remove()
instead of enabling/disabling it each time we access the registers?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-25 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-23 21:45 [PATCH 0/6] pwm: imx: Provide atomic operation for IMX PWM driver Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-23 21:45 ` [PATCH 1/6] pwm: imx: Rewrite imx_pwm_*_v1 code to facilitate switch to atomic pwm operation Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-24 15:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-25 5:54 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-10-25 6:27 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2016-10-25 6:32 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-10-25 6:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-25 6:55 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-23 21:45 ` [PATCH 2/6] pwm: imx: Move PWMv2 software reset code to a separate function Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-24 15:23 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-24 21:02 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-23 21:45 ` [PATCH 3/6] pwm: imx: Move PWMv2 wait for fifo slot " Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-24 15:23 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-23 21:45 ` [PATCH 4/6] pwm: imx: Provide atomic PWM support for IMXv2 PWM Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-24 15:25 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-23 21:45 ` [PATCH 5/6] pwm: imx: Remove redundant IMX PWMv2 code Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-24 15:27 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-23 21:45 ` [PATCH 6/6] pwm: imx: Introduce "polarity_supported" flag to PWMv2 driver Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-24 15:28 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-24 15:34 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-24 21:14 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-25 6:37 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-25 6:58 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-24 15:36 ` [PATCH 0/6] pwm: imx: Provide atomic operation for IMX PWM driver Boris Brezillon
2016-10-24 21:26 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-25 3:41 ` Stefan Agner
2016-10-25 7:07 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-25 17:08 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-10-25 17:09 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-10-27 5:59 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-12-26 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 00/11] " Lukasz Majewski
2016-12-26 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 01/11] pwm: print error messages with pr_err() instead of pr_debug() Lukasz Majewski
2016-12-26 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 02/11] pwm: imx: remove ipg clock Lukasz Majewski
2016-12-27 7:26 ` Stefan Agner
2016-12-27 7:54 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-12-28 22:01 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-12-29 7:22 ` Stefan Agner
2016-12-29 10:06 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-12-26 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 03/11] pwm: imx: Add separate set of pwm ops for PWMv1 and PWMv2 Lukasz Majewski
2016-12-26 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 04/11] pwm: imx: Rewrite imx_pwm_*_v1 code to facilitate switch to atomic pwm operation Lukasz Majewski
2016-12-26 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 05/11] pwm: imx: Move PWMv2 software reset code to a separate function Lukasz Majewski
2016-12-26 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 06/11] pwm: imx: Move PWMv2 wait for fifo slot " Lukasz Majewski
2016-12-26 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 07/11] pwm: imx: Provide atomic PWM support for i.MX PWMv2 Lukasz Majewski
2016-12-29 16:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-12-29 16:45 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-12-29 17:08 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-01-03 11:43 ` Lukasz Majewski
2017-01-03 12:46 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-01-03 17:29 ` Stefan Agner
2017-01-03 19:35 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-01-03 22:01 ` Lukasz Majewski
2017-01-03 22:18 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-01-03 22:46 ` Lukasz Majewski
2017-01-03 23:34 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-01-04 11:29 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-12-26 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 08/11] pwm: imx: Remove redundant i.MX PWMv2 code Lukasz Majewski
2016-12-26 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 09/11] pwm: core: make the PWM_POLARITY flag in DTB optional Lukasz Majewski
2016-12-26 22:56 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 10/11] pwm: imx: doc: Update imx-pwm.txt documentation entry Lukasz Majewski
2016-12-26 22:56 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 11/11] pwm: imx: Add polarity inversion support to i.MX's PWMv2 Lukasz Majewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161025082737.2ecc9fe4@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=LW@karo-electronics.de \
--cc=bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com \
--cc=fabio.estevam@nxp.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=l.majewski@majess.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).