From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [4.10, panic, regression] iscsi: null pointer deref at iscsi_tcp_segment_done+0x20d/0x2e0
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 09:33:36 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161222223336.GM4758@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161222221500.GL4758@dastard>
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 09:15:00AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 01:10:19PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Ok, so the numa issue was a red herring. With that fixed:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Better, but still bad. average files/s is not up to 200k files/s,
> > > so still a good 10-15% off where it should be. xfs_repair is back
> > > down to 10-15% off where it should be, too. bulkstat still fires off
> > > a bad page reference count warning, iscsi still panics immediately.
> >
> > Do you have CONFIG_BLK_WBT enabled, perhaps?
>
> Ok, yes, that's enabled. Let me go turn it off and see what happens.
Numbers are still all over the place.
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
.....
0 28800000 0 228175.5 21928812
0 30400000 0 167880.5 39628229
0 32000000 0 124289.5 41420925
0 33600000 0 150577.9 35382318
0 35200000 0 216535.4 16072628
0 36800000 0 233414.4 11846654
0 38400000 0 213812.0 13356633
0 40000000 0 175905.7 53012015
0 41600000 0 157028.7 34700794
0 43200000 0 138829.1 50282461
And the average is now back down to 185k files/s. repair runtime is
unchanged and still 10-15% off...
I've got to run away for a few hours right now, but I'll retest the
4.9 + xfs for-next branch when I get back to see if the problem is
my curent config or whether there really is a perf problem lurking
somewhere....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-22 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-14 22:24 [4.10, panic, regression] iscsi: null pointer deref at iscsi_tcp_segment_done+0x20d/0x2e0 Dave Chinner
2016-12-14 22:29 ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-16 18:59 ` Chris Leech
2016-12-21 22:16 ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-21 23:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-12-22 0:13 ` Chris Leech
2016-12-22 5:13 ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-22 5:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-12-22 6:50 ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-22 18:50 ` Chris Leech
2016-12-22 23:53 ` Ming Lei
2016-12-23 0:03 ` Chris Leech
2016-12-23 10:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-23 19:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-12-24 2:45 ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-24 9:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-24 10:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-24 13:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-12-24 13:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-04 14:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-22 20:22 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-12-23 7:32 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-12-23 8:33 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-01-02 21:11 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-01-03 12:28 ` Jan Kara
2017-01-04 15:26 ` Laurence Oberman
2017-01-04 17:38 ` Laurence Oberman
2017-01-08 2:02 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-01-08 2:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-01-09 20:30 ` Jan Kara
2017-01-09 20:45 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-12-22 6:28 ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-22 17:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-12-22 20:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-22 20:42 ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-22 21:06 ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-22 21:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-12-22 22:15 ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-22 22:33 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2016-12-23 3:52 ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-23 0:16 ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-22 6:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-22 6:30 ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-22 6:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161222223336.GM4758@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).