From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1754561AbdAEBBv (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 4 Jan 2017 20:01:51 -0500
Received: from mail-pg0-f67.google.com ([74.125.83.67]:34301 "EHLO
        mail-pg0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S969948AbdAEBBf (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 4 Jan 2017 20:01:35 -0500
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:01:45 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 3/8] printk: introduce per-cpu safe_print seq buffer
Message-ID: <20170105010144.GC480@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
References: <20161227141611.940-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
 <20161227141611.940-4-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
 <20170104133156.GR14894@pathway.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170104133156.GR14894@pathway.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On (01/04/17 14:31), Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Tue 2016-12-27 23:16:06, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > This patch extends the idea of NMI per-cpu buffers to regions
> > that may cause recursive printk() calls and possible deadlocks.
> > Namely, printk() can't handle printk calls from schedule code
> > or printk() calls from lock debugging code (spin_dump() for instance);
> > because those may be called with `sem->lock' already taken or any
> > other `critical' locks (p->pi_lock, etc.). An example of deadlock
> > can be
> > 
> > Usage example:
> > 
> >  printk()
> >   printk_safe_enter_irqsave(flags)
> >   //
> >   //  any printk() call from here will endup in vprintk_safe(),
> >   //  that stores messages in a special per-CPU buffer.
> >   //
> >   printk_safe_exit_irqrestore(flags)
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
> 
> I really like the new variants for printk_safe_enter/exit and
> different IRQ context.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>

thanks.

	-ss