From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Benjamin Tissoires" <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
"Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>,
"Michał Kępień" <kernel@kempniu.pl>,
"Jean Delvare" <jdelvare@suse.com>,
"Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@suse.de>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: do not enable fall back to Host Notify by default
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 19:41:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170112184101.slxulrvreq7zl2pc@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170105045722.GA17958@dtor-ws>
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 08:57:22PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Falling back unconditionally to HostNotify as primary client's interrupt
> breaks some drivers which alter their functionality depending on whether
> interrupt is present or not, so let's introduce a board flag telling I2C
> core explicitly if we want wired interrupt or HostNotify-based one:
> I2C_CLIENT_HOST_NOTIFY.
>
> For DT-based systems we introduce "host-notify" property that we convert
> to I2C_CLIENT_HOST_NOTIFY board flag.
>
> Tested-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Applied to for-current, thanks!
How do we handle driver fixes? Shall I take them via I2C to have the
dependency clear? Or can they go seperately?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-12 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-05 4:57 [PATCH v2] i2c: do not enable fall back to Host Notify by default Dmitry Torokhov
2017-01-05 12:39 ` Pali Rohár
2017-01-09 17:56 ` Rob Herring
2017-01-12 18:41 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2017-01-12 20:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170112184101.slxulrvreq7zl2pc@ninjato \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=kernel@kempniu.pl \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).