On Thu 2017-02-09 16:58:29, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> >> > +
> >> > +This is a binding for a gpio controlled switch for camera interfaces. Such a
> >> > +device is used on some embedded devices to connect two cameras to the same
> >> > +interface of a image signal processor.
> >> > +
> >> > +Required properties
> >> > +===================
> >> > +
> >> > +compatible : must contain "video-bus-switch"
> >>
> >> video-bus-gpio-mux
> >
> > Sakari already asked for rename here. I believe I waited reasonable
> > time, but got no input from you, so I did rename it. Now you decide on
> > different name.
> >
> > Can we either get timely reactions or less bikeshedding?
> 
> You mean less than 5 days because I don't see any other version of
> this? But in short, no, you can't.

Could we switch device tree bindings from "cc: subsystem, to: device
tree" to "to: subsystem, cc: device tree" mode? Currently it takes
more effort to merge the device tree parts than the relevant driver,
and that is not quite good.

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html