Re: [PATCH 2/5] perf/sdt/x86: Add renaming logic for rNN and other registers

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	alexis.berlemont@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] perf/sdt/x86: Add renaming logic for rNN and other registers
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:08:07 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170321140807.GB2531@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170207121159.b276b0a7383400a9d2452eee@kernel.org>

Em Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 12:11:59PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> On Thu,  2 Feb 2017 16:41:40 +0530
> Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > 'perf probe' is failing for sdt markers whose arguments has rNN
> > (with postfix b/w/d), %rsp, %esp, %sil etc. registers. Add renaming
> > logic for these registers.
> > 
> 
> Looks good to me.
> 
> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

Thanks, applied right after that v5 series from Alexis.

> Thanks!
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
> > index 09a7f55..d8a8dcf 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
> > @@ -48,10 +48,42 @@ static const struct sdt_name_reg sdt_reg_renamings[] = {
> >  	SDT_NAME_REG(rdx, dx),
> >  	SDT_NAME_REG(esi, si),
> >  	SDT_NAME_REG(rsi, si),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(sil, si),
> >  	SDT_NAME_REG(edi, di),
> >  	SDT_NAME_REG(rdi, di),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(dil, di),
> >  	SDT_NAME_REG(ebp, bp),
> >  	SDT_NAME_REG(rbp, bp),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(bpl, bp),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(rsp, sp),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(esp, sp),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(spl, sp),
> > +
> > +	/* rNN registers */
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r8b,  r8),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r8w,  r8),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r8d,  r8),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r9b,  r9),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r9w,  r9),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r9d,  r9),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r10b, r10),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r10w, r10),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r10d, r10),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r11b, r11),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r11w, r11),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r11d, r11),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r12b, r12),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r12w, r12),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r12d, r12),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r13b, r13),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r13w, r13),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r13d, r13),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r14b, r14),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r14w, r14),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r14d, r14),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r15b, r15),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r15w, r15),
> > +	SDT_NAME_REG(r15d, r15),
> >  	SDT_NAME_REG_END,
> >  };
> >  
> > @@ -88,18 +120,6 @@ int sdt_rename_register(char **pdesc, char *old_name)
> >  
> >  	/* Copy the chars after the register name (if need be) */
> >  	offset = prefix_len + sdt_len;
> > -	if (offset < old_desc_len) {
> > -		/*
> > -		 * The orginal register name can be suffixed by 'b',
> > -		 * 'w' or 'd' to indicate its size; so, we need to
> > -		 * skip this char if we met one.
> > -		 */
> > -		char sfx = old_desc[offset];
> > -
> > -		if (sfx == 'b' || sfx == 'w'  || sfx == 'd')
> > -			offset++;
> > -	}
> > -
> >  	if (offset < old_desc_len)
> >  		memcpy(new_desc + prefix_len + uprobe_len,
> >  			old_desc + offset, old_desc_len - offset);
> > -- 
> > 2.9.3
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>