linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: fu.wei@linaro.org
To: rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, marc.zyngier@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
	hanjun.guo@linaro.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rruigrok@codeaurora.org,
	harba@codeaurora.org, cov@codeaurora.org, timur@codeaurora.org,
	graeme.gregory@linaro.org, al.stone@linaro.org, jcm@redhat.com,
	wei@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	leo.duran@amd.com, wim@iguana.be, linux@roeck-us.net,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, tn@semihalf.com,
	christoffer.dall@linaro.org, julien.grall@arm.com,
	Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v24 10/11] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: add GTDT support for memory-mapped timer
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 02:40:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170414184014.8524-11-fu.wei@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170414184014.8524-1-fu.wei@linaro.org>

From: Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org>

The patch add memory-mapped timer register support by using the
information provided by the new GTDT driver of ACPI.

Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
[Mark: verify CNTFRQ, only register the first frame]
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
---
 drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
index 05f2f7a..8981173 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
@@ -1385,10 +1385,78 @@ CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(armv7_arch_timer_mem, "arm,armv7-timer-mem",
 		       arch_timer_mem_of_init);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GTDT
-/* Initialize per-processor generic timer */
+static int __init
+arch_timer_mem_verify_cntfrq(struct arch_timer_mem *timer_mem)
+{
+	struct arch_timer_mem_frame *frame;
+	u32 rate;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES; i++) {
+		frame = &timer_mem->frame[i];
+
+		if (!frame->valid)
+			continue;
+
+		rate = arch_timer_mem_frame_get_cntfrq(frame);
+		if (rate == arch_timer_rate)
+			continue;
+
+		pr_err(FW_BUG "CNTFRQ mismatch: frame @ %pa: (0x%08lx), CPU: (0x%08lx)\n",
+		       &frame->cntbase,
+		       (unsigned long)rate, (unsigned long)arch_timer_rate);
+
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init arch_timer_mem_acpi_init(int platform_timer_count)
+{
+	struct arch_timer_mem *timers, *timer;
+	struct arch_timer_mem_frame *frame;
+	int timer_count, i, ret = 0;
+
+	timers = kcalloc(platform_timer_count, sizeof(*timers), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!timers)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	ret = acpi_arch_timer_mem_init(timers, &timer_count);
+	if (ret || !timer_count)
+		goto out;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < timer_count; i++) {
+		ret = arch_timer_mem_verify_cntfrq(&timers[i]);
+		if (ret) {
+			pr_err("Disabling MMIO timers due to CNTFRQ mismatch\n");
+			goto out;
+		}
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * While unlikely, it's theoretically possible that none of the frames
+	 * in a timer expose the combination of feature we want.
+	 */
+	for (i = i; i < timer_count; i++) {
+		timer = &timers[i];
+
+		frame = arch_timer_mem_find_best_frame(timer);
+		if (frame)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	if (frame)
+		ret = arch_timer_mem_frame_register(frame);
+out:
+	kfree(timers);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/* Initialize per-processor generic timer and memory-mapped timer(if present) */
 static int __init arch_timer_acpi_init(struct acpi_table_header *table)
 {
-	int ret;
+	int ret, platform_timer_count;
 
 	if (arch_timers_present & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) {
 		pr_warn("already initialized, skipping\n");
@@ -1397,7 +1465,7 @@ static int __init arch_timer_acpi_init(struct acpi_table_header *table)
 
 	arch_timers_present |= ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15;
 
-	ret = acpi_gtdt_init(table, NULL);
+	ret = acpi_gtdt_init(table, &platform_timer_count);
 	if (ret) {
 		pr_err("Failed to init GTDT table.\n");
 		return ret;
@@ -1440,6 +1508,10 @@ static int __init arch_timer_acpi_init(struct acpi_table_header *table)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	if (platform_timer_count &&
+	    arch_timer_mem_acpi_init(platform_timer_count))
+		pr_err("Failed to initialize memory-mapped timer.\n");
+
 	return arch_timer_common_init();
 }
 CLOCKSOURCE_ACPI_DECLARE(arch_timer, ACPI_SIG_GTDT, arch_timer_acpi_init);
-- 
2.9.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-14 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-14 18:40 [PATCH v24 00/11] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch_timer fu.wei
2017-04-14 18:40 ` [PATCH v24 01/11] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: split dt-only rate handling fu.wei
2017-04-14 18:40 ` [PATCH v24 02/11] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: refactor arch_timer_needs_probing fu.wei
2017-04-14 18:40 ` [PATCH v24 03/11] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: move arch_timer_needs_of_probing into DT init call fu.wei
2017-04-14 18:40 ` [PATCH v24 04/11] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: add structs to describe MMIO timer fu.wei
2017-04-14 18:40 ` [PATCH v24 05/11] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: split MMIO timer probing fu.wei
2017-04-14 18:40 ` [PATCH v24 06/11] acpi/arm64: Add GTDT table parse driver fu.wei
2017-04-14 18:40 ` [PATCH v24 07/11] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: simplify ACPI support code fu.wei
2017-04-14 18:40 ` [PATCH v24 08/11] acpi: Introduce acpi_unregister_irq function fu.wei
2017-04-18 15:58   ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-19 15:09     ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-14 18:40 ` [PATCH v24 09/11] acpi/arm64: Add memory-mapped timer support in GTDT driver fu.wei
2017-04-18 17:21   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-19 15:07     ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-19 15:45       ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-19 15:56         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-14 18:40 ` fu.wei [this message]
2017-04-14 18:40 ` [PATCH v24 11/11] acpi/arm64: Add SBSA Generic Watchdog " fu.wei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170414184014.8524-11-fu.wei@linaro.org \
    --to=fu.wei@linaro.org \
    --cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
    --cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=harba@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=leo.duran@amd.com \
    --cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rruigrok@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tn@semihalf.com \
    --cc=wei@redhat.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).