From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Cc: christoffer.dall@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
lenb@kernel.org, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk,
robert.moore@intel.com, lv.zheng@intel.com, nkaje@codeaurora.org,
zjzhang@codeaurora.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
james.morse@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
eun.taik.lee@samsung.com, sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com,
labbott@redhat.com, shijie.huang@arm.com,
rruigrok@codeaurora.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com,
tn@semihalf.com, fu.wei@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bristot@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org,
Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com, punit.agrawal@arm.com, astone@redhat.com,
harba@codeaurora.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org,
john.garry@huawei.com, shiju.jose@huawei.com, joe@perches.com,
rafael@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, gengdongjiu@huawei.com,
xiexiuqi@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V15 02/11] ras: acpi/apei: cper: add support for generic data v3 structure
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:14:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170420111451.6mo4o2oulwal3j33@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1492556723-9189-3-git-send-email-tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 05:05:14PM -0600, Tyler Baicar wrote:
> The ACPI 6.1 spec adds a new version of the generic data structure.
which data structure? HEST?
> Add support to handle the new structure as well as properly verify
> and iterate through the generic data entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
> CC: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
This is clearly a new version of the patch so Reviewed-by tags don't
apply anymore. Ditto for the next one. Remember to remove such tags in
the future when the patches are changed non-trivially in a following
iteration.
> ---
> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> include/acpi/ghes.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index 6d87ab7..dfb7dd2 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static void ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int
> int flags = -1;
> int sec_sev = ghes_severity(gdata->error_severity);
> struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
> - mem_err = (struct cper_sec_mem_err *)(gdata + 1);
> + mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
while you're at it.
> if (!(mem_err->validation_bits & CPER_MEM_VALID_PA))
> return;
> @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
> if (!uuid_le_cmp(*(uuid_le *)gdata->section_type,
> CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM)) {
> struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
> - mem_err = (struct cper_sec_mem_err *)(gdata+1);
> + mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
Ditto
+ add a \n here.
> ghes_edac_report_mem_error(ghes, sev, mem_err);
>
> arch_apei_report_mem_error(sev, mem_err);
> @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
> else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*(uuid_le *)gdata->section_type,
> CPER_SEC_PCIE)) {
> struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie_err;
> - pcie_err = (struct cper_sec_pcie *)(gdata+1);
> + pcie_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
Ditto.
> if (sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
> sec_sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
> pcie_err->validation_bits & CPER_PCIE_VALID_DEVICE_ID &&
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> index d425374..8328a6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> #include <linux/aer.h>
> +#include <acpi/ghes.h>
>
> #define INDENT_SP " "
>
> @@ -386,8 +387,9 @@ static void cper_print_pcie(const char *pfx, const struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie,
> pfx, pcie->bridge.secondary_status, pcie->bridge.control);
> }
>
> -static void cper_estatus_print_section(
> - const char *pfx, const struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int sec_no)
> +static void
> +cper_estatus_print_section(const char *pfx, struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
> + int sec_no)
> {
> uuid_le *sec_type = (uuid_le *)gdata->section_type;
> __u16 severity;
> @@ -403,14 +405,18 @@ static void cper_estatus_print_section(
>
> snprintf(newpfx, sizeof(newpfx), "%s%s", pfx, INDENT_SP);
> if (!uuid_le_cmp(*sec_type, CPER_SEC_PROC_GENERIC)) {
> - struct cper_sec_proc_generic *proc_err = (void *)(gdata + 1);
> + struct cper_sec_proc_generic *proc_err;
> +
> + proc_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
Ditto.
> printk("%s""section_type: general processor error\n", newpfx);
> if (gdata->error_data_length >= sizeof(*proc_err))
> cper_print_proc_generic(newpfx, proc_err);
> else
> goto err_section_too_small;
> } else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*sec_type, CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM)) {
> - struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err = (void *)(gdata + 1);
> + struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
> +
> + mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
Ditto.
> printk("%s""section_type: memory error\n", newpfx);
> if (gdata->error_data_length >=
> sizeof(struct cper_sec_mem_err_old))
> @@ -419,7 +425,9 @@ static void cper_estatus_print_section(
> else
> goto err_section_too_small;
> } else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*sec_type, CPER_SEC_PCIE)) {
> - struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie = (void *)(gdata + 1);
> + struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie;
> +
> + pcie = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
Ditto.
> printk("%s""section_type: PCIe error\n", newpfx);
> if (gdata->error_data_length >= sizeof(*pcie))
> cper_print_pcie(newpfx, pcie, gdata);
> @@ -438,7 +446,7 @@ void cper_estatus_print(const char *pfx,
> const struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus)
> {
> struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata;
> - unsigned int data_len, gedata_len;
> + unsigned int data_len;
> int sec_no = 0;
> char newpfx[64];
> __u16 severity;
> @@ -452,11 +460,10 @@ void cper_estatus_print(const char *pfx,
> data_len = estatus->data_length;
> gdata = (struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(estatus + 1);
> snprintf(newpfx, sizeof(newpfx), "%s%s", pfx, INDENT_SP);
> - while (data_len >= sizeof(*gdata)) {
> - gedata_len = gdata->error_data_length;
<-- \n here while you're at it.
We have to start making this code more readable. It looks write-only
right now.
> + while (data_len >= acpi_hest_get_size(gdata)) {
> cper_estatus_print_section(newpfx, gdata, sec_no);
> - data_len -= gedata_len + sizeof(*gdata);
> - gdata = (void *)(gdata + 1) + gedata_len;
> + data_len -= acpi_hest_get_record_size(gdata);
> + gdata = acpi_hest_get_next(gdata);
> sec_no++;
> }
> }
> @@ -486,12 +493,12 @@ int cper_estatus_check(const struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus)
> return rc;
> data_len = estatus->data_length;
> gdata = (struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(estatus + 1);
> - while (data_len >= sizeof(*gdata)) {
> - gedata_len = gdata->error_data_length;
> - if (gedata_len > data_len - sizeof(*gdata))
Ditto.
> + while (data_len >= acpi_hest_get_size(gdata)) {
> + gedata_len = acpi_hest_get_error_length(gdata);
> + if (gedata_len > data_len - acpi_hest_get_size(gdata))
> return -EINVAL;
<-- \n here too
> - data_len -= gedata_len + sizeof(*gdata);
> - gdata = (void *)(gdata + 1) + gedata_len;
> + data_len -= acpi_hest_get_record_size(gdata);
> + gdata = acpi_hest_get_next(gdata);
> }
> if (data_len)
> return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes.h b/include/acpi/ghes.h
> index 68f088a..b89361a 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/ghes.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/ghes.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,20 @@
> #define GHES_TO_CLEAR 0x0001
> #define GHES_EXITING 0x0002
>
> +#define acpi_hest_get_error_length(gdata) \
> + (((struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(gdata))->error_data_length)
> +#define acpi_hest_get_size(gdata) \
> + ((acpi_hest_get_version(gdata) >= 3) ? \
> + sizeof(struct acpi_hest_generic_data_v300) : \
> + sizeof(struct acpi_hest_generic_data))
> +#define acpi_hest_get_record_size(gdata) \
> + (acpi_hest_get_size(gdata) + \
> + acpi_hest_get_error_length(gdata))
> +#define acpi_hest_get_next(gdata) \
> + ((void *)(gdata) + acpi_hest_get_record_size(gdata))
> +#define acpi_hest_get_version(gdata) \
> + (gdata->revision >> 8)
Make all those inline functions.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-20 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-18 23:05 [PATCH V15 00/11] Add UEFI 2.6 and ACPI 6.1 updates for RAS on ARM64 Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 01/11] acpi: apei: read ack upon ghes record consumption Tyler Baicar
2017-04-19 18:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-19 20:31 ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-19 20:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 02/11] ras: acpi/apei: cper: add support for generic data v3 structure Tyler Baicar
2017-04-20 11:14 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 03/11] cper: add timestamp print to CPER status printing Tyler Baicar
2017-04-21 12:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 16:04 ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-21 17:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 18:08 ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-21 18:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 04/11] efi: parse ARM processor error Tyler Baicar
2017-04-21 17:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 18:22 ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-24 17:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-25 16:05 ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-25 16:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 05/11] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 06/11] acpi: apei: handle SEA notification type for ARMv8 Tyler Baicar
2017-04-25 17:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-25 17:41 ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-25 17:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-08 17:28 ` James Morse
2017-05-08 19:59 ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-05-12 16:45 ` James Morse
2017-08-14 7:55 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 07/11] acpi: apei: panic OS with fatal error status block Tyler Baicar
2017-04-28 13:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 08/11] efi: print unrecognized CPER section Tyler Baicar
2017-05-05 13:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 09/11] ras: acpi / apei: generate trace event for " Tyler Baicar
2017-05-05 17:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-05 18:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 10/11] trace, ras: add ARM processor error trace event Tyler Baicar
2017-05-08 17:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 11/11] arm/arm64: KVM: add guest SEA support Tyler Baicar
2017-05-08 17:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-08 19:54 ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-05-08 20:22 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170420111451.6mo4o2oulwal3j33@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=astone@redhat.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=devel@acpica.org \
--cc=eun.taik.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=fu.wei@linaro.org \
--cc=gengdongjiu@huawei.com \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=harba@codeaurora.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=nkaje@codeaurora.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rruigrok@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com \
--cc=shijie.huang@arm.com \
--cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
--cc=tbaicar@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tn@semihalf.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
--cc=zjzhang@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).