linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Zi Yan <zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Andrea Reale <ar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm, numa: rework do_pages_move
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 10:14:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180105091443.GJ2801@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db9b9752-a106-a3af-12f5-9894adee7ba7@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Fri 05-01-18 09:22:22, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
[...]
> Hi Michal,
> 
> After slightly modifying your test case (like fixing the page size for
> powerpc and just doing simple migration from node 0 to 8 instead of the
> interleaving), I tried to measure the migration speed with and without
> the patches on mainline. Its interesting....
> 
> 					10000 pages | 100000 pages
> 					--------------------------
> Mainline				165 ms		1674 ms
> Mainline + first patch (move_pages)	191 ms		1952 ms
> Mainline + all three patches		146 ms		1469 ms
> 
> Though overall it gives performance improvement, some how it slows
> down migration after the first patch. Will look into this further.

What are you measuring actually? All pages migrated to the same node?
Do you have any profiles? How stable are the results?

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-05  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-03  8:25 [PATCH 0/3] unclutter thp migration Michal Hocko
2018-01-03  8:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm, numa: rework do_pages_move Michal Hocko
2018-01-05  3:52   ` Anshuman Khandual
2018-01-05  9:14     ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-01-05  9:20       ` Anshuman Khandual
2018-01-05  9:33         ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-05 17:15           ` Christopher Lameter
2018-01-05 18:09             ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-05 18:41               ` Christopher Lameter
2018-01-05 18:48                 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-05 19:27                   ` Christopher Lameter
2018-01-05 19:44                     ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-29 22:06   ` Zi Yan
2018-01-29 22:35     ` Andrew Morton
2018-01-29 23:39       ` Zi Yan
2018-01-29 23:48         ` Andrew Morton
2018-01-03  8:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm, migrate: remove reason argument from new_page_t Michal Hocko
2018-01-03  9:11   ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-03 14:00   ` Anshuman Khandual
2018-01-03 14:09     ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-03 14:19       ` Anshuman Khandual
2018-01-03  8:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: unclutter THP migration Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180105091443.GJ2801@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).