linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Allow userspace to define the microcode version
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:16:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180226111630.GB4377@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANRm+Cy+Cr1-AMwM+u20X53=GqY0zfOugFypZcZwyJmnnwNNwA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 07:02:29PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> > So a guest will have *two* microcode revisions - both of which are most
> > likely wrong?!
> 
> Just one revision.

So what does "the non-sensical value which is written by the guest will
not reflect to guest-visible microcode revision" even mean then?

cat /proc/cpuinfo

in the guest shows what exactly?

And what would RDMSR 0x8b show then?

> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/9/29 The original discussion explain in
> more details.

My argument stands: exposing microcode revisions to guests is the wrong
approach. Instead, the kernel should not look at microcode revisions if
it runs virtualized.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-26 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-26  7:23 [PATCH] KVM: X86: Allow userspace to define the microcode version Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26  9:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 10:06   ` Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26 10:49     ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 11:02       ` Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26 11:16         ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2018-02-26 11:25           ` Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26 11:30             ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 11:37               ` Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26 11:44                 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 11:52                   ` Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26 11:54                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-26 12:15                     ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 12:16                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-26 12:18                         ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-26 12:22                           ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 12:41                             ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-26 13:05                               ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 14:39                               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-02-26 14:46                                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-26 19:37                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 20:51                                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-02-26 21:30                                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-02-27  8:33                                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-03-08  9:24                                       ` [tip:x86/pti] x86/spectre_v2: Don't check microcode versions when running under hypervisors tip-bot for Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-04-17 10:40                               ` [PATCH] KVM: X86: Allow userspace to define the microcode version Wanpeng Li
2018-04-17 20:24                                 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-04-18  3:24                                   ` Wanpeng Li
2018-04-18  9:03                                     ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-04-18 10:36                                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-23 12:58                                         ` Borislav Petkov
2018-04-23 13:08                                           ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-04-23 13:23                                             ` Borislav Petkov
2018-04-23 16:03                                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-24  2:59                                         ` Wanpeng Li
2018-04-24  3:14                                           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-04-24  5:09                                             ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-24 13:44                                               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-04-24  2:56                               ` Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26 11:47       ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-26 12:20         ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26  9:26 Liran Alon
2018-02-26 10:08 ` Wanpeng Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180226111630.GB4377@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).