linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: swiotlb_{alloc,free}_buffer should depend on CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_OPS
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 18:03:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180324170351.GA511@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180323185707.GD25533@char.us.oracle.com>

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 02:57:07PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 06:49:30PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Otherwise we might get unused symbol warnings for configs that built
> > swiotlb.c only for use by xen-swiotlb.c and that don't otherwise select
> > CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_OPS, which is possible on arm.
> > 
> > Fixes: 16e73adbca76 ("dma/swiotlb: Remove swiotlb_{alloc,free}_coherent()")
> > Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> 
> 
> Alternatively could we set the Kconfig to slect DMA_DIRECT_OPS?


IFF we build swiotlb.c only for xen-swiotlb we don't need DMA_DIRECT_OPS.
IF you are fine with just requring it as well that would be doable nicely
only if we consolidate to a single defintion of CONFIG_SWIOTLB instead
of one per architecture.  Which is something we should do anyway,
so I'll look into it once I get some time.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-24 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-23 17:49 [PATCH] swiotlb: swiotlb_{alloc,free}_buffer should depend on CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_OPS Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-23 18:57 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-03-23 19:41   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-03-24 17:03   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-03-24 20:05     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-03-26 13:42       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-23 19:54 ` [tip:x86/dma] swiotlb: Make swiotlb_{alloc,free}_buffer " tip-bot for Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180324170351.GA511@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).