4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: "Mickaël Salaün" [ Upstream commit 34a048cc06802556e5f96f325dc32cc2f6a11225 ] Do not confuse the compiler with a semicolon preceding a block. Replace the semicolon with an empty block to avoid a warning: gcc -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall -lpthread seccomp_bpf.c -o /.../linux/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf In file included from seccomp_bpf.c:40:0: seccomp_bpf.c: In function ‘change_syscall’: ../kselftest_harness.h:558:2: warning: this ‘for’ clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] for (; _metadata->trigger; _metadata->trigger = __bail(_assert)) ^ ../kselftest_harness.h:574:14: note: in expansion of macro ‘OPTIONAL_HANDLER’ } while (0); OPTIONAL_HANDLER(_assert) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../kselftest_harness.h:440:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘__EXPECT’ __EXPECT(expected, seen, ==, 0) ^~~~~~~~ seccomp_bpf.c:1313:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘EXPECT_EQ’ EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); ^~~~~~~~~ seccomp_bpf.c:1317:2: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the ‘for’ { ^ Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Will Drewry Acked-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c @@ -1318,7 +1318,7 @@ void change_syscall(struct __test_metada iov.iov_len = sizeof(regs); ret = ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET, tracee, NT_PRSTATUS, &iov); #endif - EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(0, ret) {} #if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__) || defined(__powerpc__) || \ defined(__s390__) || defined(__hppa__)