From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
byungchul.park@lge.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/8] rcu: Use rcu_node as temporary variable in funnel locking loop
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 17:43:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180515004334.GC209519@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180514180027.GC26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:00:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 08:15:38PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > The funnel locking loop in rcu_start_this_gp uses rcu_root as a
> > temporary variable while walking the combining tree. This causes a
> > tiresome exercise of a code reader reminding themselves that rcu_root
> > may not be root. Lets just call it rcu_node, and then finally when
> > rcu_node is the rcu_root, lets assign it at that time.
> >
> > Just a clean up patch, no logical change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
>
> I agree that my names could use some improvement, but given that you
> called it rnp_node in the patch and rcu_node in the commit log, I would
> argue that rnp_node has a Hamming-distance problem. ;-)
>
> How about rnp_start for the formal parameter, rnp for the cursor running
> up the tree, and retaining rnp_root for the root?
Ok, that's fine with me. Probably easier to read too. I will rewrite it
accordingly.
thanks,
- Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-15 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-14 3:15 [PATCH RFC 0/8] rcu fixes, clean ups for rcu/dev Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 1/8] rcu: Add comment documenting how rcu_seq_snap works Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 3:47 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-05-14 5:05 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14 17:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 1:51 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 3:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 7:02 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 12:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 18:41 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 19:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 22:55 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-16 15:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-16 23:21 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14 3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 2/8] rcu: Clarify usage of cond_resched for tasks-RCU Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 14:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-14 17:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 0:35 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 3:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-14 3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 3/8] rcu: Add back the cpuend tracepoint Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 18:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 0:43 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14 3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 4/8] rcu: Get rid of old c variable from places in tree RCU Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 17:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 0:41 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14 3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 5/8] rcu: Use rcu_node as temporary variable in funnel locking loop Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 18:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 0:43 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2018-05-14 3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 6/8] rcu: Add back the Startedleaf tracepoint Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 18:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 0:57 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 3:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 23:04 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-16 15:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-16 23:13 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14 3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 7/8] rcu: trace CleanupMore condition only if needed Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 19:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 1:01 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 3:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-14 3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 8/8] rcu: Fix cpustart tracepoint gp_seq number Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 20:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 1:02 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180515004334.GC209519@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).