From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ohad@wizery.com,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] remoteproc: Introduce prepare/unprepare ops for rproc coredump
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 18:39:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201805221858.4fcVEaBU%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180521184559.20864-1-sibis@codeaurora.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6496 bytes --]
Hi Sibi,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on v4.17-rc6]
[also build test ERROR on next-20180517]
[cannot apply to remoteproc/for-next]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Sibi-Sankar/remoteproc-Introduce-prepare-unprepare-ops-for-rproc-coredump/20180522-133348
config: arm64-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 7.2.0-11) 7.2.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make.cross ARCH=arm64
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c: In function 'q6v5_start':
>> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c:796:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'q6v5_enable_irqs'; did you mean 'enable_irq'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
q6v5_enable_irqs(qproc);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
enable_irq
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +796 drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c
725
726 static int q6v5_start(struct rproc *rproc)
727 {
728 struct q6v5 *qproc = (struct q6v5 *)rproc->priv;
729 int xfermemop_ret;
730 int ret;
731
732 ret = q6v5_regulator_enable(qproc, qproc->proxy_regs,
733 qproc->proxy_reg_count);
734 if (ret) {
735 dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to enable proxy supplies\n");
736 goto clear_coredump_pending;
737 }
738
739 ret = q6v5_clk_enable(qproc->dev, qproc->proxy_clks,
740 qproc->proxy_clk_count);
741 if (ret) {
742 dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to enable proxy clocks\n");
743 goto disable_proxy_reg;
744 }
745
746 ret = q6v5_regulator_enable(qproc, qproc->active_regs,
747 qproc->active_reg_count);
748 if (ret) {
749 dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to enable supplies\n");
750 goto disable_proxy_clk;
751 }
752 ret = reset_control_deassert(qproc->mss_restart);
753 if (ret) {
754 dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to deassert mss restart\n");
755 goto disable_vdd;
756 }
757
758 ret = q6v5_clk_enable(qproc->dev, qproc->active_clks,
759 qproc->active_clk_count);
760 if (ret) {
761 dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to enable clocks\n");
762 goto assert_reset;
763 }
764
765 /* Assign MBA image access in DDR to q6 */
766 xfermemop_ret = q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership(qproc, &qproc->mba_perm, true,
767 qproc->mba_phys,
768 qproc->mba_size);
769 if (xfermemop_ret) {
770 dev_err(qproc->dev,
771 "assigning Q6 access to mba memory failed: %d\n",
772 xfermemop_ret);
773 goto disable_active_clks;
774 }
775
776 writel(qproc->mba_phys, qproc->rmb_base + RMB_MBA_IMAGE_REG);
777
778 ret = q6v5proc_reset(qproc);
779 if (ret)
780 goto reclaim_mba;
781
782 ret = q6v5_rmb_mba_wait(qproc, 0, 5000);
783 if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) {
784 dev_err(qproc->dev, "MBA boot timed out\n");
785 goto halt_axi_ports;
786 } else if (ret != RMB_MBA_XPU_UNLOCKED &&
787 ret != RMB_MBA_XPU_UNLOCKED_SCRIBBLED) {
788 dev_err(qproc->dev, "MBA returned unexpected status %d\n", ret);
789 ret = -EINVAL;
790 goto halt_axi_ports;
791 }
792
793 if (qproc->coredump_pending) {
794 dev_info(qproc->dev, "MBA booted, skipping mpss for coredump\n");
795 qproc->coredump_pending = false;
> 796 q6v5_enable_irqs(qproc);
797 xfermemop_ret = q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership(qproc,
798 &qproc->mba_perm, false,
799 qproc->mba_phys,
800 qproc->mba_size);
801 if (xfermemop_ret)
802 dev_err(qproc->dev, "Failed to reclaim mba buffer\n");
803 return 0;
804 }
805
806 dev_info(qproc->dev, "MBA booted, loading mpss\n");
807
808 ret = q6v5_mpss_load(qproc);
809 if (ret)
810 goto reclaim_mpss;
811
812 ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&qproc->start_done,
813 msecs_to_jiffies(5000));
814 if (ret == 0) {
815 dev_err(qproc->dev, "start timed out\n");
816 ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
817 goto reclaim_mpss;
818 }
819
820 xfermemop_ret = q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership(qproc, &qproc->mba_perm, false,
821 qproc->mba_phys,
822 qproc->mba_size);
823 if (xfermemop_ret)
824 dev_err(qproc->dev,
825 "Failed to reclaim mba buffer system may become unstable\n");
826 qproc->running = true;
827
828 q6v5_clk_disable(qproc->dev, qproc->proxy_clks,
829 qproc->proxy_clk_count);
830 q6v5_regulator_disable(qproc, qproc->proxy_regs,
831 qproc->proxy_reg_count);
832
833 return 0;
834
835 reclaim_mpss:
836 xfermemop_ret = q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership(qproc, &qproc->mpss_perm,
837 false, qproc->mpss_phys,
838 qproc->mpss_size);
839 WARN_ON(xfermemop_ret);
840
841 halt_axi_ports:
842 q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_q6);
843 q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_modem);
844 q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_nc);
845
846 reclaim_mba:
847 xfermemop_ret = q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership(qproc, &qproc->mba_perm, false,
848 qproc->mba_phys,
849 qproc->mba_size);
850 if (xfermemop_ret) {
851 dev_err(qproc->dev,
852 "Failed to reclaim mba buffer, system may become unstable\n");
853 }
854
855 disable_active_clks:
856 q6v5_clk_disable(qproc->dev, qproc->active_clks,
857 qproc->active_clk_count);
858
859 assert_reset:
860 reset_control_assert(qproc->mss_restart);
861 disable_vdd:
862 q6v5_regulator_disable(qproc, qproc->active_regs,
863 qproc->active_reg_count);
864 disable_proxy_clk:
865 q6v5_clk_disable(qproc->dev, qproc->proxy_clks,
866 qproc->proxy_clk_count);
867 disable_proxy_reg:
868 q6v5_regulator_disable(qproc, qproc->proxy_regs,
869 qproc->proxy_reg_count);
870 clear_coredump_pending:
871 qproc->coredump_pending = false;
872
873 return ret;
874 }
875
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 59055 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-22 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-21 18:45 [PATCH v2] remoteproc: Introduce prepare/unprepare ops for rproc coredump Sibi Sankar
2018-05-22 10:39 ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2018-05-29 5:05 ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-05-29 14:06 ` Sibi S
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201805221858.4fcVEaBU%fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=sibis@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).