linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrei Vagin <avagin@virtuozzo.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [12/24] proc: Add fs_context support to procfs [ver #7]
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 22:50:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180628055003.GA15563@outlook.office365.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31831.1530003427@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2545 bytes --]

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 09:57:07AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Andrei Vagin <avagin@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
> 
> > > > > -	mnt = kern_mount_data(&proc_fs_type, ns, 0);
> > > 
> > > Here ns->user_ns and get_current_cred()->user_ns are not always equal
> > 
> > What do you think about the attached patch?
> > ...
> > -	fc = vfs_new_fs_context(&proc_fs_type, NULL, 0,
> > -				FS_CONTEXT_FOR_KERNEL_MOUNT);
> > +	fc = vfs_new_fs_context_userns(&proc_fs_type, NULL, 0,
> > +				FS_CONTEXT_FOR_KERNEL_MOUNT, ns->user_ns);
> 
> Or you could just change fc->user_ns immediately after calling
> vfs_new_fs_context().  This is what network filesystems should do with
> fc->net_ns, for example.

Ok, it works for me. The patch is attached.

> 
> > -struct fs_context *vfs_new_fs_context(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> > +struct fs_context *vfs_new_fs_context_userns(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> >  				      struct dentry *reference,
> >  				      unsigned int sb_flags,
> > -				      enum fs_context_purpose purpose)
> > +				      enum fs_context_purpose purpose,
> > +				      struct user_namespace *user_ns)
> 
> 
> If you'd really rather add a new parameter, please don't rename the function
> to vfs_new_fs_context_userns() - just add a new parameter.  There don't need
> to be two versions of it.
> 
> 
> This brings me to another thought:  I want to add the ability to let
> namespaces be configured by userspace, for example:

It may be a good feature, but I am not sure about procfs. A procfs
instance is created per pidns, so they should have the same owner
userns.

> 
> 	fd = fsopen("nfs");
> 	sprintf(buf, "ns user %d", my_user_ns_fd);
> 	write(fd, buf);
> 	sprintf(buf, "ns net %d", my_net_ns_fd);
> 	write(fd, buf);
> 	write(fd, "s fedoraproject.org:/pub");
> 	write(fd, "o intr");
> 	...
> 
> I think therefore, I might need to insert another phase between creating the
> context and calling the filesystem initialiser:
> 
> 	fc = vfs_new_fs_context(&afs_fs_type, mntpt, 0,
> 				FS_CONTEXT_FOR_SUBMOUNT);
> 
> followed by:
> 
> 	vfs_sb_set_namespace(fc, THIS_IS_USER_NS, user_ns);
> 	vfs_sb_set_namespace(fc, THIS_IS_NET_NS, net_ns);
> 
> but then we'd need to do:
> 
> 	vfs_begin_options(fc);
> 
> before continuing (unless we made this happen automatically on the receipt of
> the first option):
> 
> 	afs_mntpt_set_params(fc, mntpt);
> 	vfs_get_tree(fc);
> 	mnt = vfs_create_mount(fc, 0);
> 
> Alternatively, we could do the namespace setting after initialisation and let
> the fs apply the changes itself.
> 
> David

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-proc-set-a-proper-user-namespace-for-fs_context.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 851 bytes --]

From 2297ffb333a7bcee466a5273a3fc84202b9695a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrei Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 22:45:43 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] proc: set a proper user namespace for fs_context

A user namespace should be taken from a pidns for which a procfs is created.

Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
---
 fs/proc/root.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/proc/root.c b/fs/proc/root.c
index efbdc08a3c86..59aaf06a40c7 100644
--- a/fs/proc/root.c
+++ b/fs/proc/root.c
@@ -303,6 +303,11 @@ int pid_ns_prepare_proc(struct pid_namespace *ns)
 	if (IS_ERR(fc))
 		return PTR_ERR(fc);
 
+	if (fc->user_ns != ns->user_ns) {
+		put_user_ns(fc->user_ns);
+		fc->user_ns = get_user_ns(ns->user_ns);
+	}
+
 	ctx = fc->fs_private;
 	if (ctx->pid_ns != ns) {
 		put_pid_ns(ctx->pid_ns);
-- 
2.17.0


  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-28  5:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-19 13:31 [PATCH 00/24] VFS: Introduce filesystem context [ver #7] David Howells
2018-04-19 13:31 ` [PATCH 01/24] vfs: Undo an overly zealous MS_RDONLY -> SB_RDONLY conversion " David Howells
2018-04-19 13:31 ` [PATCH 02/24] VFS: Suppress MS_* flag defs within the kernel unless explicitly enabled " David Howells
2018-04-19 13:31 ` [PATCH 03/24] VFS: Introduce the structs and doc for a filesystem context " David Howells
2018-04-23  3:36   ` Randy Dunlap
2018-05-01 14:29   ` David Howells
2018-05-01 15:31     ` Randy Dunlap
2018-04-19 13:31 ` [PATCH 04/24] VFS: Add LSM hooks for " David Howells
2018-04-19 20:32   ` Paul Moore
2018-04-20 15:35   ` David Howells
2018-04-23 13:25     ` Stephen Smalley
2018-04-24 15:22     ` David Howells
2018-04-25 14:07       ` Stephen Smalley
2018-04-19 13:31 ` [PATCH 05/24] apparmor: Implement security hooks for the new mount API " David Howells
2018-05-04  0:10   ` John Johansen
2018-05-11 12:20   ` David Howells
2018-04-19 13:31 ` [PATCH 06/24] tomoyo: " David Howells
2018-04-19 13:31 ` [PATCH 07/24] smack: Implement filesystem context security hooks " David Howells
2018-04-19 13:31 ` [PATCH 08/24] VFS: Require specification of size of mount data for internal mounts " David Howells
2018-04-19 13:32 ` [PATCH 09/24] VFS: Implement a filesystem superblock creation/configuration context " David Howells
2018-04-19 13:32 ` [PATCH 10/24] VFS: Remove unused code after filesystem context changes " David Howells
2018-04-19 13:32 ` [PATCH 11/24] procfs: Move proc_fill_super() to fs/proc/root.c " David Howells
2018-04-19 13:32 ` [PATCH 12/24] proc: Add fs_context support to procfs " David Howells
2018-06-19  3:34   ` [12/24] " Andrei Vagin
2018-06-26  6:13     ` Andrei Vagin
2018-06-26  7:27       ` Andrei Vagin
2018-06-26  8:57       ` David Howells
2018-06-28  5:50         ` Andrei Vagin [this message]
2018-04-19 13:32 ` [PATCH 13/24] ipc: Convert mqueue fs to fs_context " David Howells
2018-04-19 13:32 ` [PATCH 14/24] cpuset: Use " David Howells
2018-04-19 13:32 ` [PATCH 15/24] kernfs, sysfs, cgroup, intel_rdt: Support " David Howells
2018-04-19 13:33 ` [PATCH 16/24] hugetlbfs: Convert to " David Howells
2018-04-19 13:33 ` [PATCH 17/24] VFS: Remove kern_mount_data() " David Howells
2018-04-19 13:33 ` [PATCH 18/24] VFS: Implement fsopen() to prepare for a mount " David Howells
2018-04-19 13:33 ` [PATCH 19/24] VFS: Implement fsmount() to effect a pre-configured " David Howells
2018-04-19 13:33 ` [PATCH 20/24] afs: Fix server record deletion " David Howells
2018-04-19 13:33 ` [PATCH 21/24] net: Export get_proc_net() " David Howells
2018-04-19 13:33 ` [PATCH 22/24] afs: Add fs_context support " David Howells
2018-04-19 13:33 ` [PATCH 23/24] afs: Implement namespacing " David Howells
2018-04-19 13:33 ` [PATCH 24/24] afs: Use fs_context to pass parameters over automount " David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180628055003.GA15563@outlook.office365.com \
    --to=avagin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).