linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] mm, slab/slub: introduce kmalloc-reclaimable caches
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 11:16:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180719181613.GA26595@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180718133620.6205-3-vbabka@suse.cz>

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 03:36:15PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Kmem caches can be created with a SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT flag, which indicates
> they contain objects which can be reclaimed under memory pressure (typically
> through a shrinker). This makes the slab pages accounted as NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE
> in vmstat, which is reflected also the MemAvailable meminfo counter and in
> overcommit decisions. The slab pages are also allocated with __GFP_RECLAIMABLE,
> which is good for anti-fragmentation through grouping pages by mobility.
> 
> The generic kmalloc-X caches are created without this flag, but sometimes are
> used also for objects that can be reclaimed, which due to varying size cannot
> have a dedicated kmem cache with SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT flag. A prominent example
> are dcache external names, which prompted the creation of a new, manually
> managed vmstat counter NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES in commit f1782c9bc547
> ("dcache: account external names as indirectly reclaimable memory").
> 
> To better handle this and any other similar cases, this patch introduces
> SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT variants of kmalloc caches, named kmalloc-rcl-X.
> They are used whenever the kmalloc() call passes __GFP_RECLAIMABLE among gfp
> flags. They are added to the kmalloc_caches array as a new type. Allocations
> with both __GFP_DMA and __GFP_RECLAIMABLE will use a dma type cache.
> 
> This change only applies to SLAB and SLUB, not SLOB. This is fine, since SLOB's
> target are tiny system and this patch does add some overhead of kmem management
> objects.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> ---
>  include/linux/slab.h | 16 +++++++++++----
>  mm/slab_common.c     | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
> index 4299c59353a1..d89e934e0d8b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
> @@ -296,11 +296,12 @@ static inline void __check_heap_object(const void *ptr, unsigned long n,
>                                 (KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE) : 16)
>  
>  #define KMALLOC_NORMAL	0
> +#define KMALLOC_RECLAIM	1
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> -#define KMALLOC_DMA	1
> -#define KMALLOC_TYPES	2
> +#define KMALLOC_DMA	2
> +#define KMALLOC_TYPES	3
>  #else
> -#define KMALLOC_TYPES	1
> +#define KMALLOC_TYPES	2
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifndef CONFIG_SLOB
> @@ -309,12 +310,19 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *kmalloc_caches[KMALLOC_TYPES][KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH + 1];
>  static __always_inline unsigned int kmalloc_type(gfp_t flags)
>  {
>  	int is_dma = 0;
> +	int is_reclaimable;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
>  	is_dma = !!(flags & __GFP_DMA);
>  #endif
>  
> -	return is_dma;
> +	is_reclaimable = !!(flags & __GFP_RECLAIMABLE);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If an allocation is botth __GFP_DMA and __GFP_RECLAIMABLE, return
                                 ^^
			       typo
> +	 * KMALLOC_DMA and effectively ignore __GFP_RECLAIMABLE
> +	 */
> +	return (is_dma * 2) + (is_reclaimable & !is_dma);

Maybe
is_dma * KMALLOC_DMA + (is_reclaimable && !is_dma) * KMALLOC_RECLAIM
looks better?

>  }
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
> index 4614248ca381..614fb7ab8312 100644
> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
> @@ -1107,10 +1107,21 @@ void __init setup_kmalloc_cache_index_table(void)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void __init new_kmalloc_cache(int idx, slab_flags_t flags)
> +static void __init
> +new_kmalloc_cache(int idx, int type, slab_flags_t flags)
>  {
> -	kmalloc_caches[KMALLOC_NORMAL][idx] = create_kmalloc_cache(
> -					kmalloc_info[idx].name,
> +	const char *name;
> +
> +	if (type == KMALLOC_RECLAIM) {
> +		flags |= SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT;
> +		name = kasprintf(GFP_NOWAIT, "kmalloc-rcl-%u",
> +						kmalloc_info[idx].size);
> +		BUG_ON(!name);

I'd replace this with WARN_ON() and falling back to kmalloc_info[idx].name.

> +	} else {
> +		name = kmalloc_info[idx].name;
> +	}
> +
> +	kmalloc_caches[type][idx] = create_kmalloc_cache(name,
>  					kmalloc_info[idx].size, flags, 0,
>  					kmalloc_info[idx].size);
>  }

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-19 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-18 13:36 [PATCH v3 0/7] kmalloc-reclaimable caches Vlastimil Babka
2018-07-18 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] mm, slab: combine kmalloc_caches and kmalloc_dma_caches Vlastimil Babka
2018-07-19  8:10   ` Mel Gorman
2018-07-20  9:30     ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-07-30 15:38   ` Christopher Lameter
2018-07-18 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] mm, slab/slub: introduce kmalloc-reclaimable caches Vlastimil Babka
2018-07-19  8:23   ` Mel Gorman
2018-07-20  9:32     ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-07-19 18:16   ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2018-07-20  9:35     ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-07-30 15:41   ` Christopher Lameter
2018-07-18 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] mm, slab: allocate off-slab freelists as reclaimable when appropriate Vlastimil Babka
2018-07-19  8:35   ` Mel Gorman
2018-07-20  9:37     ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-07-30 15:45   ` Christopher Lameter
2018-07-18 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] dcache: allocate external names from reclaimable kmalloc caches Vlastimil Babka
2018-07-19  8:42   ` Mel Gorman
2018-07-18 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] mm: rename and change semantics of nr_indirectly_reclaimable_bytes Vlastimil Babka
2018-07-30 15:46   ` Christopher Lameter
2018-07-18 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] mm, proc: add KReclaimable to /proc/meminfo Vlastimil Babka
2018-07-18 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] mm, slab: shorten kmalloc cache names for large sizes Vlastimil Babka
2018-07-19  8:46   ` Mel Gorman
2018-07-30 15:48   ` Christopher Lameter
2018-07-31  8:55     ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-07-19 19:53 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] kmalloc-reclaimable caches Roman Gushchin
2018-07-20  9:45   ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180719181613.GA26595@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com \
    --to=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).