From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@techadventures.net>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, yasu.isimatu@gmail.com,
logang@deltatee.com, dave.jiang@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Create __shrink_pages and move it to offline_pages
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 09:56:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180808075614.GB9568@techadventures.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44f74b58-aae0-a44c-3b98-7b1aac186f8e@redhat.com>
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 09:45:37AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 08.08.2018 09:38, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 06:13:45PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >>> And since we know for sure that memhotplug-code cannot call it with ZONE_DEVICE,
> >>> I think this can be done easily.
> >>
> >> This might change down road but for now this is correct. They are
> >> talks to enumerate device memory through standard platform mechanisms
> >> and thus the kernel might see new types of resources down the road and
> >> maybe we will want to hotplug them directly from regular hotplug path
> >> as ZONE_DEVICE (lot of hypothetical at this point ;)).
> >
> > Well, I think that if that happens this whole thing will become
> > much easier, since we will not have several paths for doing the same thing.
> >
> > Another thing that I realized is that while we want to move all operation-pages
> > from remove_memory() path to offline_pages(), this can get tricky.
> >
> > Unless I am missing something, the devices from HMM and devm are not being registered
> > against "memory_subsys" struct, and so, they never get to call memory_subsys_offline()
> > and so offline_pages().
> >
> > Which means that we would have to call __remove_zone() from those paths.
> > But this alone will not work.
>
> I mean, they move it to the zone ("replacing online/offlining code"), so
> they should take of removing it again.
Yeah, I guess so.
I mean, of course we can make this work by placing __remove_zone in devm_memremap_pages_release
and hmm_devmem_release functions and make sure to call offline_mem_sections first.
But sounds a bit "hacky"..
Thanks
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-08 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-07 13:37 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Do not touch pages in remove_memory path osalvador
2018-08-07 13:37 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Add nid parameter to arch_remove_memory osalvador
2018-08-07 13:37 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Create __shrink_pages and move it to offline_pages osalvador
2018-08-07 13:52 ` Jerome Glisse
2018-08-07 14:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-08-07 15:19 ` Jerome Glisse
2018-08-07 15:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-08-07 20:48 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-08-07 22:13 ` Jerome Glisse
2018-08-08 7:38 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-08-08 7:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-08-08 7:56 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2018-08-08 8:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-08-08 13:42 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-08-08 17:55 ` Jerome Glisse
2018-08-08 21:29 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-08-09 7:50 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-08-09 7:52 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-08-08 7:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-08-08 8:00 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-08-07 14:59 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-07 15:18 ` Jerome Glisse
2018-08-08 6:47 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-08 16:58 ` Jerome Glisse
2018-08-08 21:28 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-08-09 8:24 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-09 14:27 ` Jerome Glisse
2018-08-09 15:09 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-09 16:58 ` Jerome Glisse
2018-08-09 20:50 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-08-16 14:58 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-08-16 17:32 ` Jerome Glisse
2018-08-08 9:45 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-08-08 17:33 ` Jerome Glisse
2018-08-07 13:37 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Refactor shrink_zone/pgdat_span osalvador
2018-08-07 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Do not touch pages in remove_memory path David Hildenbrand
2018-08-07 14:19 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-08-07 14:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-08-07 14:28 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-08-07 14:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-08-07 14:52 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-08-15 14:05 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-08-15 14:32 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180808075614.GB9568@techadventures.net \
--to=osalvador@techadventures.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).