From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com>
Cc: toshi.kani@hpe.com, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@suse.de,
brijesh.singh@amd.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
jglisse@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
mhocko@suse.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
malat@debian.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
osalvador@techadventures.net, yasu.isimatu@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] resource: Merge resources on a node when hot-adding memory
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 18:12:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180809181224.0b7417e51215565dbda9f665@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180809025409.31552-1-rashmica.g@gmail.com>
On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 12:54:09 +1000 Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com> wrote:
> When hot-removing memory release_mem_region_adjustable() splits
> iomem resources if they are not the exact size of the memory being
> hot-deleted. Adding this memory back to the kernel adds a new
> resource.
>
> Eg a node has memory 0x0 - 0xfffffffff. Offlining and hot-removing
> 1GB from 0xf40000000 results in the single resource 0x0-0xfffffffff being
> split into two resources: 0x0-0xf3fffffff and 0xf80000000-0xfffffffff.
>
> When we hot-add the memory back we now have three resources:
> 0x0-0xf3fffffff, 0xf40000000-0xf7fffffff, and 0xf80000000-0xfffffffff.
>
> Now if we try to remove some memory that overlaps these resources,
> like 2GB from 0xf40000000, release_mem_region_adjustable() fails as it
> expects the chunk of memory to be within the boundaries of a single
> resource.
>
> This patch adds a function request_resource_and_merge(). This is called
> instead of request_resource_conflict() when registering a resource in
> add_memory(). It calls request_resource_conflict() and if hot-removing is
> enabled (if it isn't we won't get resource fragmentation) we attempt to
> merge contiguous resources on the node.
What is the end-user impact of this patch?
Do you believe the fix should be merged into 4.18? Backporting into
-stable kernels? If so, why?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-10 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-09 2:54 [PATCH v3] resource: Merge resources on a node when hot-adding memory Rashmica Gupta
2018-08-09 14:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-09 15:03 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-08-10 1:12 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2018-08-10 6:55 ` Rashmica Gupta
2018-08-10 8:28 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-10 13:00 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-10 14:25 ` Rashmica Gupta
2018-08-10 19:32 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-08-10 12:26 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180809181224.0b7417e51215565dbda9f665@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=malat@debian.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@techadventures.net \
--cc=rashmica.g@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).