From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/speculation/l1tf: suggest what to do on systems with too much RAM
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 21:25:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180823192547.GS29735@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180823154648.GD12066@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
On Thu 23-08-18 08:46:48, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 04:28:12PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > Two users have reported [1] that they have an "extremely unlikely" system
> > with more than MAX_PA/2 memory and L1TF mitigation is not effective. Let's
> > make the warning more helpful by suggesting the proper mem=X kernel boot param,
> > a rough calculation of how much RAM can be lost (not precise if there's holes
> > between MAX_PA/2 and max_pfn in the e820 map) and a link to the L1TF document
> > to help decide if the mitigation is worth the unusable RAM.
>
> I'm not sure anyone would really do that. After all you probably prefer
> your memory. And if it's really a non ECC client part they are are
> already used to to live very dangerously because their undetected RAM bit error
> rate will be significant. L1TF is probably one of your smaller problems
> in this case...
There are people who care about L1TF mitigations. I am not going to
question their motivation. In any case a hint how to make the mitigation
active again sounds more useful than something that sounds as scary as
"you are vulnerable".
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-23 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-23 13:44 [PATCH] x86/speculation/l1tf: fix off-by-one error when warning that system has too much RAM Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-23 13:56 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-23 14:28 ` [PATCH] x86/speculation/l1tf: suggest what to do on systems with " Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-23 15:46 ` Andi Kleen
2018-08-23 19:25 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-08-23 19:38 ` Andi Kleen
2018-08-23 20:05 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-23 22:07 ` Andi Kleen
2018-08-23 19:03 ` kbuild test robot
2018-08-23 19:23 ` kbuild test robot
2018-08-23 19:27 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-24 7:32 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-24 7:55 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/speculation/l1tf: Suggest " tip-bot for Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-24 10:36 ` [PATCH] x86/speculation/l1tf: suggest " Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-24 12:10 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-24 12:20 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-24 13:57 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/speculation/l1tf: Suggest " tip-bot for Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-23 15:44 ` [PATCH] x86/speculation/l1tf: fix off-by-one error when warning that system has " Andi Kleen
2018-08-23 20:20 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-24 2:22 ` Andre Tomt
2018-08-24 3:35 ` Andi Kleen
2018-08-29 2:04 ` Christopher Snowhill
2018-08-24 8:52 ` xxxxxx xxxxxx
2018-08-24 7:55 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/speculation/l1tf: Fix " tip-bot for Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180823192547.GS29735@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).