From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix quota info to adjust recovered data
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:46:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180912024601.GA75537@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ffbfbc85-f7ac-dd5c-b20f-d08868adb4ee@huawei.com>
On 09/12, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/9/12 9:25, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 09/12, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 2018/9/12 8:27, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> On 09/11, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>>> On 09/12, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>>>> On 2018/9/12 4:15, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>>>>> fsck.f2fs is able to recover the quota structure, since roll-forward recovery
> >>>>>> can recover it based on previous user information.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I didn't get it, both fsck and kernel recover quota file based all inodes'
> >>>>> uid/gid/prjid, if {x}id didn't change, wouldn't those two recovery result be the
> >>>>> same?
> >>>>
> >>>> I thought that, but had to add this, since I was encountering quota errors right
> >>>> after getting some files recovered. And, I thought it'd make it more safe to do
> >>>> fsck after roll-forward recovery.
> >>>>
> >>>> Anyway, let me test again without this patch for a while.
> >>>
> >>> Hmm, I just got a fsck failure right after some files recovered.
> >>
> >> To make sure, do you test with "f2fs: guarantee journalled quota data by
> >> checkpoint"? if not, I think there is no guarantee that f2fs can recover
> >> quote info into correct quote file, because, in last checkpoint, quota file
> >> may was corrupted/inconsistent. Right?
>
> Oh, I forget to mention that, I add a patch to fsck to let it noticing
> CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG flag, and by default, fsck will fix corrupted quote
> file if the flag is set, but w/o this flag, quota file is still corrupted
> detected by fsck, I guess there is bug in v8.
>
> Can you add that in fsck too? so we can separate real kernel bug and quota
> file corruption due to dquot subsystem error caused like below case:
I'm testing to trigger fsck when it sees the below flag. But, when considering
old f2fs-tools, we may need a way to detect mkfs version in superblock in order
to determine whether we can rely on this new flag or not.
>
> +static int f2fs_dquot_acquire(struct dquot *dquot)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = dquot_acquire(dquot);
> + if (ret == -ENOSPC || ret == -EIO)
> + set_sbi_flag(F2FS_SB(dquot->dq_sb), SBI_QUOTA_NEED_REPAIR);
> + return ret;
> +}
>
> >
> > I hit the failure with v8. And, the test scenario is 1) enable fault injection
> > 2) run fsstress, 3) call shutdowon, 4) kill fsstress, 5) unmount, 6) fsck, 7)
> > mount, 8) fsck, 9) go 1).
> >
> > So, I'm hitting failure in 8) fsck. I expect 6) fsck should fix any corruption
> > and 7) recovered some files on clean checkpoint.
>
> I see, I can add this case too, does this exist in your xfstest tree in github?
I think so.
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 3 +++
> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> >>>>>> index 95511ed11a22..1fde86a2107e 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> >>>>>> @@ -675,6 +675,9 @@ int f2fs_recover_fsync_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool check_only)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> need_writecp = true;
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> + /* quota is not fully updated due to the lack of user information. */
> >>>>>> + set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> /* step #2: recover data */
> >>>>>> err = recover_data(sbi, &inode_list, &dir_list);
> >>>>>> if (!err)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> >>>> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> >>>
> >>> .
> >>>
> >
> > .
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-12 2:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-11 20:15 [PATCH] f2fs: fix quota info to adjust recovered data Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-11 23:51 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2018-09-12 0:06 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-12 0:27 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-12 1:13 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-12 1:25 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-12 1:40 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-12 1:46 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-12 19:54 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-12 23:28 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-18 1:19 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-18 1:38 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-18 2:05 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-18 10:13 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-18 16:45 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-19 1:38 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-19 22:38 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-20 9:46 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-20 21:42 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-21 7:48 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-26 0:29 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-26 1:21 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-26 1:44 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-26 2:06 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-26 2:09 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-26 2:14 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-27 1:16 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-28 17:37 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-28 23:40 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-29 10:38 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-30 23:58 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-10-01 0:35 ` Chao Yu
2018-10-01 1:27 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-10-01 1:37 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-12 2:46 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2018-09-12 2:57 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-12 19:50 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-12 23:30 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180912024601.GA75537@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).