From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
chao.p.peng@intel.com, chao.gao@intel.com,
isaku.yamahata@intel.com, michael.h.kelley@microsoft.com,
tianyu.lan@microsoft.com, "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] x86/hyperv: make HvNotifyLongSpinWait hypercall
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 19:15:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181022171516.GH3117@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba75b994-c1a6-6e91-6499-b9af90636fcf@redhat.com>
Firstly, who come a patch that is grubbing around in kernel/locking/ has
an x86/hyperv subject and isn't Cc'ed to the locking maintainers?
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 12:31:45PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 10/22/2018 03:32 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > On 22/10/2018 03:53, Yi Sun wrote:
> >> On 18-10-19 16:20:52, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >>> On 19/10/2018 15:13, Yi Sun wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>>> diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
> >>>> index 0130e48..9e88c7e 100644
> >>>> --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
> >>>> +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
> >>>> @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
> >>>> #include <linux/bootmem.h>
> >>>> #include <linux/debug_locks.h>
> >>>>
> >>>> +#include <asm/mshyperv.h>
> >>>> +
> >>>> /*
> >>>> * Implement paravirt qspinlocks; the general idea is to halt the vcpus instead
> >>>> * of spinning them.
> >>>> @@ -305,6 +307,10 @@ static void pv_wait_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node, struct mcs_spinlock *prev)
> >>>> wait_early = true;
> >>>> break;
> >>>> }
> >>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) && defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
> >>>> + if (!hv_notify_long_spin_wait(SPIN_THRESHOLD - loop))
> >>>> + break;
> >>>> +#endif
Secondly; how come you thought that was acceptable in any way shape or
form?
> > vcpu_is_preempted() is already part of this loop. And this is a paravirt
> > hook. Can't you make use of that? This might require adding another
> > parameter to this hook, but I'd prefer that over another pv-spinlock
> > hook.
> I agree with Juergen on that. I would suggest rename the
> vcpu_is_preempted hook into a more generic vcpu_stop_spinning, perhaps,
> so different hypervisors can act on the information accordingly. Adding
> an extra parameter is fine.
No; no extra parameters. vcpu_is_preempted() is a simple and intuitive
interface. Why would we want to make it complicated?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-22 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-19 13:13 [PATCH v1 0/2] Enable HvNotifyLongSpinWait for Hyper-V Yi Sun
2018-10-19 13:13 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] x86/hyperv: get spinlock retry number on Hyper-V Yi Sun
2018-10-19 13:13 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] x86/hyperv: make HvNotifyLongSpinWait hypercall Yi Sun
2018-10-19 14:20 ` Juergen Gross
2018-10-22 1:53 ` Yi Sun
2018-10-22 7:32 ` Juergen Gross
2018-10-22 16:31 ` Waiman Long
2018-10-22 17:15 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-10-22 17:27 ` Waiman Long
2018-10-22 17:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-22 18:01 ` Waiman Long
2018-10-23 2:57 ` Yi Sun
2018-10-23 8:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-23 9:33 ` Yi Sun
2018-10-31 1:54 ` Yi Sun
2018-10-31 14:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-31 15:07 ` Waiman Long
2018-10-31 17:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-01 3:20 ` Yi Sun
2018-11-01 8:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-01 12:59 ` Waiman Long
2018-11-05 6:54 ` Yi Sun
2018-10-24 16:53 ` Michael Kelley
2018-10-25 2:23 ` Yi Sun
2018-10-31 2:06 ` Yi Sun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181022171516.GH3117@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@intel.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=michael.h.kelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tianyu.lan@microsoft.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).