linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] x86/efi: Unmap EFI boot services code/data regions from efi_pgd
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 07:07:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181029060708.GB128403@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181026213845.28166-2-sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>


* Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> wrote:

> Ideally, after kernel assumes control of the platform, firmware shouldn't
> access EFI boot services code/data regions. But, it's noticed that this is
> not so true in many x86 platforms. Hence, during boot, kernel reserves EFI
> boot services code/data regions [1] and maps [2] them to efi_pgd so that
> call to set_virtual_address_map() doesn't fail. After returning from
> set_virtual_address_map(), kernel frees the reserved regions [3] but they
> still remain mapped.
> 
> This means that any code that's running in efi_pgd address space (e.g: any
> EFI runtime service) would still be able to access EFI boot services
> code/data regions but the contents of these regions would have long been
> over written by someone else as they are freed by efi_free_boot_services().
> So, it's important to unmap these regions. After unmapping EFI boot
> services code/data regions, any illegal access by buggy firmware to these
> regions would result in page fault which will be handled by efi specific
> fault handler.
> 
> Unmapping EFI boot services code/data regions will result in clearing
> PAGE_PRESENT bit and it shouldn't bother L1TF cases because it's already
> handled by protnone_mask() at arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-invert.h.
> 
> [1] Please see efi_reserve_boot_services()
> [2] Please see efi_map_region() -> __map_region()
> [3] Please see efi_free_boot_services()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
> Cc: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h |  2 ++
>  arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c               | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c       | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h
> index b64acb08a62b..cda04ecf5432 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h
> @@ -566,6 +566,8 @@ extern pmd_t *lookup_pmd_address(unsigned long address);
>  extern phys_addr_t slow_virt_to_phys(void *__address);
>  extern int kernel_map_pages_in_pgd(pgd_t *pgd, u64 pfn, unsigned long address,
>  				   unsigned numpages, unsigned long page_flags);
> +extern int kernel_unmap_pages_in_pgd(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long address,
> +				     unsigned long numpages);
>  #endif	/* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
>  
>  #endif /* _ASM_X86_PGTABLE_DEFS_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
> index 51a5a69ecac9..248f16181bed 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
> @@ -2147,6 +2147,32 @@ int kernel_map_pages_in_pgd(pgd_t *pgd, u64 pfn, unsigned long address,
>  	return retval;
>  }
>  
> +int kernel_unmap_pages_in_pgd(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long address,
> +			      unsigned long numpages)
> +{
> +	int retval;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The typical sequence for unmapping is to find a pte through
> +	 * lookup_address_in_pgd() (ideally, it should never return NULL because
> +	 * the address is already mapped) and change it's protections.
> +	 * As pfn is the *target* of a mapping, it's not useful while unmapping.
> +	 */
> +	struct cpa_data cpa = {
> +		.vaddr		= &address,
> +		.pgd		= pgd,
> +		.numpages	= numpages,
> +		.mask_set	= __pgprot(0),
> +		.mask_clr	= __pgprot(_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_RW),
> +		.flags		= 0,
> +	};
> +
> +	retval = __change_page_attr_set_clr(&cpa, 0);
> +	__flush_tlb_all();

So, just to clarify, 'pfn' is kept at 0 here? Might make sense to write 
it out explicitly like 'flags', even if it's not used by 
__change_page_attr_set_clr().


> +
> +	return retval;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * The testcases use internal knowledge of the implementation that shouldn't
>   * be exposed to the rest of the kernel. Include these directly here.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> index 669babcaf245..fb1c44b11235 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> @@ -370,6 +370,24 @@ void __init efi_reserve_boot_services(void)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Apart from having VA mappings for EFI boot services code/data regions,
> + * (duplicate) 1:1 mappings were also created as a quirk for buggy firmware. So,
> + * unmap both 1:1 and VA mappings.
> + */
> +static void __init efi_unmap_pages(efi_memory_desc_t *md)
> +{
> +	pgd_t *pgd = efi_mm.pgd;
> +	u64 pa = md->phys_addr;
> +	u64 va = md->virt_addr;
> +
> +	if (kernel_unmap_pages_in_pgd(pgd, pa, md->num_pages))
> +		pr_err("Failed to unmap 1:1 mapping for 0x%llx\n", pa);
> +
> +	if (kernel_unmap_pages_in_pgd(pgd, va, md->num_pages))
> +		pr_err("Failed to unmap VA mapping for 0x%llx\n", va);
> +}
> +
>  void __init efi_free_boot_services(void)
>  {
>  	phys_addr_t new_phys, new_size;
> @@ -394,6 +412,13 @@ void __init efi_free_boot_services(void)
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> +		/*
> +		 * Before calling set_virtual_address_map(), EFI boot services
> +		 * code/data regions were mapped as a quirk for buggy firmware.
> +		 * Unmap them from efi_pgd before freeing them up.
> +		 */
> +		efi_unmap_pages(md);
> +
>  		/*
>  		 * Nasty quirk: if all sub-1MB memory is used for boot
>  		 * services, we can get here without having allocated the

Assuming nothing breaks and Ard likes it too:

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-29  6:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-26 21:38 [PATCH V2 0/2] Unmap EFI boot services code/data regions after boot Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2018-10-26 21:38 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] x86/efi: Unmap EFI boot services code/data regions from efi_pgd Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2018-10-29  6:07   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2018-10-29  7:26     ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2018-10-29 14:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-29 17:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-29 17:21     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-29 18:01       ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2018-10-29 18:11         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-29 18:18           ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-29 18:32             ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2018-10-29 18:38     ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2018-10-26 21:38 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] x86/efi: Move efi_<reserve/free>_boot_services() to arch/x86 Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2018-10-29 17:14   ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181029060708.GB128403@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=bhsharma@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).