From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmscan: return NODE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN in node_reclaim() when CONFIG_NUMA is n
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:49:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181113074914.5kgiww44gpqit45y@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181113053615.GJ21824@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 09:36:15PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:17:50PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>> Commit fa5e084e43eb ("vmscan: do not unconditionally treat zones that
>> fail zone_reclaim() as full") changed the return value of node_reclaim().
>> The original return value 0 means NODE_RECLAIM_SOME after this commit.
>>
>> While the return value of node_reclaim() when CONFIG_NUMA is n is not
>> changed. This will leads to call zone_watermark_ok() again.
>>
>> This patch fix the return value by adjusting to NODE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN. Since
>> it is not proper to include "mm/internal.h", just hard coded it.
>
>Since the return value is defined in mm/internal.h that means no code
>outside mm/ can call node_reclaim (nor should it). So let's move both
>of node_reclaim's declarations to mm/internal.h instead of keeping them
>in linux/swap.h.
That's reasonable, thanks.
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-13 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-13 4:17 [PATCH] vmscan: return NODE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN in node_reclaim() when CONFIG_NUMA is n Wei Yang
2018-11-13 5:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-11-13 7:49 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2018-11-13 8:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Wei Yang
2018-11-13 12:56 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-13 13:18 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-13 13:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-11-13 13:18 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-13 13:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181113074914.5kgiww44gpqit45y@master \
--to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).