From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
marcandre.lureau@redhat.com, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] mm/memfd: make F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal more robust
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:13:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181120211335.GC22801@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F8E28229-C99E-4711-982B-5B5DE0F70F16@amacapital.net>
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 02:02:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> > On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:33:18PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Joel,
> >>>
> >>>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:39:26 -0800 Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 07:13:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:21 PM Joel Fernandes (Google)
> >>>>> <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> A better way to do F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal was discussed [1] last week
> >>>>>> where we don't need to modify core VFS structures to get the same
> >>>>>> behavior of the seal. This solves several side-effects pointed out by
> >>>>>> Andy [2].
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181111173650.GA256781@google.com/
> >>>>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/69CE06CC-E47C-4992-848A-66EB23EE6C74@amacapital.net/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> >>>>>> Fixes: 5e653c2923fd ("mm: Add an F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal to memfd")
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What tree is that commit in? Can we not just fold this in?
> >>>>
> >>>> It is in linux-next. Could we keep both commits so we have the history?
> >>>
> >>> Well, its in Andrew's mmotm, so its up to him.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Unless mmotm is more magical than I think, the commit hash in your fixed
> >> tag is already nonsense. mmotm gets rebased all the time, and is only
> >> barely a git tree.
> >
> > I wouldn't go so far to call it nonsense. It was a working patch, it just did
> > things differently. Your help with improving the patch is much appreciated.
>
> I’m not saying the patch is nonsense — I’m saying the *hash* may be
> nonsense. akpm uses a bunch of .patch files and all kinds of crazy scripts,
> and the mmotm.git tree is not stable at all.
>
Oh, ok. Sorry for misunderstanding and thanks for clarification. :-)
> > I am Ok with whatever Andrew wants to do, if it is better to squash it with
> > the original, then I can do that and send another patch.
> >
> >
>
> From experience, Andrew will food in fixups on request :)
Andrew, could you squash this patch into the one titled ("mm: Add an
F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal to memfd")? That one was already picked up by -next
but I imagine you might have a crazy script as Andy pointed out for exactly
these situations. ;-)
thanks,
- Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-20 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-20 5:21 [PATCH -next 1/2] mm/memfd: make F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal more robust Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-11-20 5:21 ` [PATCH -next 2/2] selftests/memfd: modify tests for F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-11-22 23:21 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-20 15:13 ` [PATCH -next 1/2] mm/memfd: make F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal more robust Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-20 18:39 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-20 20:07 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-11-20 20:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-20 20:47 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-20 21:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-20 21:13 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2018-11-22 2:27 ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-22 3:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-22 23:09 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-25 0:42 ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-25 0:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-11-26 13:35 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181120211335.GC22801@google.com \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=khalid.aziz@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).