linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org, johannes.berg@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/27] locking/lockdep: Check data structure consistency
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 13:30:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181129123039.GJ2131@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181128234325.110011-24-bvanassche@acm.org>

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 03:43:21PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:

> +static bool in_list(struct list_head *e, struct list_head *h)
> +{
> +	struct list_head *f;
> +
> +	list_for_each(f, h)
> +		if (e == f)
> +			return true;

Coding style wants { } around any multi line block, even if C doesn't
strictly require it.

> +
> +	return false;
> +}

> +static bool check_lock_chain_key(struct lock_chain *chain)
> +{
> +	u64 chain_key = 0;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = chain->base; i < chain->base + chain->depth; i++)
> +		chain_key = iterate_chain_key(chain_key, chain_hlocks[i] + 1);
> +	/*
> +	 * The 'unsigned long long' casts avoid that a compiler warning
> +	 * is reported when building tools/lib/lockdep.
> +	 */
> +	if (chain->chain_key != chain_key)
> +		printk(KERN_INFO "chain %lld: key %#llx <> %#llx\n",
> +		       (unsigned long long)(chain - lock_chains),
> +		       (unsigned long long)chain->chain_key,
> +		       (unsigned long long)chain_key);

Idem on the { }

> +	return chain->chain_key == chain_key;
> +}
> +
> +static bool check_data_structures(void)
> +{
> +	struct lock_class *class;
> +	struct lock_chain *chain;
> +	struct hlist_head *head;
> +	struct lock_list *e;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Check whether all list entries that are in use occur in a class
> +	 * lock list.
> +	 */
> +	list_for_each_entry(e, &all_list_entries, alloc_entry) {
> +		if (!in_any_class_list(&e->lock_order_entry)) {
> +			printk(KERN_INFO "list entry %ld is not in any class list; class %s <> %s\n",
> +			       e - list_entries,
> +			       e->class->name ? : "(?)",
> +			       e->links_to->name ? : "(?)");
> +			return false;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Check whether all list entries that are not in use do not occur in
> +	 * a class lock list.
> +	 */
> +	list_for_each_entry(e, &free_list_entries, alloc_entry) {
> +		if (in_any_class_list(&e->lock_order_entry)) {
> +			printk(KERN_INFO "list entry %ld occurs in a class list; class %s <> %s\n",
> +			       e - list_entries,
> +			       e->class && e->class->name ? e->class->name :
> +			       "(?)",
> +			       e->links_to && e->links_to->name ?
> +			       e->links_to->name : "(?)");
> +			return false;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Check whether all classes have valid lock lists. */
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lock_classes); i++) {
> +		class = &lock_classes[i];
> +		if (!class->locks_before.next)
> +			continue;
> +		if (!class_lock_list_valid(class, &class->locks_before))
> +			return false;
> +		if (!class_lock_list_valid(class, &class->locks_after))
> +			return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Check the chain_key of all lock chains. */
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(chainhash_table); i++) {
> +		head = chainhash_table + i;
> +		hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(chain, head, entry)
> +			if (!check_lock_chain_key(chain))
> +				return false;

And again.

> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}

IIRC there were a few other sites in the series, please check them all.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-29 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-28 23:42 [PATCH 00/27] locking/lockdep: Add support for dynamic keys Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:42 ` [PATCH 01/27] lockdep tests: Display compiler warning and error messages Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 02/27] lockdep tests: Fix shellcheck warnings Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 03/27] lockdep tests: Improve testing accuracy Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 04/27] lockdep tests: Run lockdep tests a second time under Valgrind Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 05/27] liblockdep: Rename "trywlock" into "trywrlock" Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 06/27] liblockdep: Add dummy print_irqtrace_events() implementation Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 07/27] lockdep tests: Test the lockdep_reset_lock() implementation Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 08/27] locking/lockdep: Declare local symbols static Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 09/27] locking/lockdep: Inline __lockdep_init_map() Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 10/27] locking/lockdep: Introduce lock_class_cache_is_registered() Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 11/27] timekeeping: Assign a name to tk_core.seq.dep_map Bart Van Assche
2018-12-05 10:03   ` [tip:timers/core] timekeeping: Use proper seqcount initializer tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 12/27] net/core: Assign a name to devnet_rename_seq.dep_map Bart Van Assche
2018-11-29  0:45   ` David Miller
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 13/27] locking/lockdep: Complain if a lock object has no name Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 14/27] locking/lockdep: Remove a superfluous INIT_LIST_HEAD() statement Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 15/27] locking/lockdep: Make concurrent lockdep_reset_lock() calls safe Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 16/27] locking/lockdep: Stop using RCU primitives to access all_lock_classes Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 17/27] locking/lockdep: Make zap_class() remove all matching lock order entries Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 18/27] locking/lockdep: Reorder struct lock_class members Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 19/27] locking/lockdep: Retain the class key and name while freeing a lock class Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 20/27] locking/lockdep: Free lock classes that are no longer in use Bart Van Assche
2018-11-29 10:37   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 21/27] locking/lockdep: Rename lock_list.entry into lock_list.lock_order_entry Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 22/27] locking/lockdep: Reuse list entries that are no longer in use Bart Van Assche
2018-11-29 10:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-29 12:01     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-29 16:48       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-12-01 20:24         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-12-03 16:40           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-12-03 17:32             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-12-03 18:16               ` Bart Van Assche
2018-12-04  8:14                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-12-04 16:08                   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 23/27] locking/lockdep: Check data structure consistency Bart Van Assche
2018-11-29 12:30   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-11-29 16:50     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-29 16:59       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 24/27] locking/lockdep: Introduce __lockdep_free_key_range() Bart Van Assche
2018-11-29 10:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 25/27] locking/lockdep: Add support for dynamic keys Bart Van Assche
2018-11-29 10:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-12-03 17:07     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-12-03 17:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-29 12:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-29 16:59     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 26/27] kernel/workqueue: Use dynamic lockdep keys for workqueues Bart Van Assche
2018-11-28 23:43 ` [PATCH 27/27] lockdep tests: Test dynamic key registration Bart Van Assche
2018-11-29 12:31 ` [PATCH 00/27] locking/lockdep: Add support for dynamic keys Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181129123039.GJ2131@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).