linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
	Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>, Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
	Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>,
	Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Oza Pawandeep <poza@codeaurora.org>,
	Ravikiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Enable SERR# forwarding for Type-1 PCI devices
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 18:41:59 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190202004159.GX229773@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1542206821-24503-1-git-send-email-bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com>

[+cc others who have commented or been copied on this ancient issue]

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 08:17:01PM +0530, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> As per Figure 6-3 in PCIe r4.0, sec 6.2.6, ERR_ messages
> will be forwarded from the secondary interface to the primary interface,
> if the SERR# Enable bit in the Bridge Control register is set.
> Currently PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR is being enabled only in
> ACPI flow.
> This patch enables PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR for Type-1 PCI device.

I apologize for being so slow to respond to this.

I applied it to pci/aer for v5.1 with the following changelog:

    PCI: Enable SERR# forwarding for all bridges
    
    As per Figure 6-3 in PCIe r4.0, sec 6.2.6, ERR_ messages will be forwarded
    from the secondary interface to the primary interface, if the SERR# Enable
    bit in the Bridge Control register is set.
    
    It seems clear that an ACPI hotplug parameter method (_HPP or _HPX) that
    tells us to "enable SERR in the command register" (ACPI v6.2, sec 6.2.8,
    6.2.9.1) refers to PCI_COMMAND_SERR, which enables reporting of errors by
    the function itself.
    
    For bridges, we also interpreted that to mean we should enable
    PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR, which enables *forwarding* of errors by the bridge.
    But we didn't enable PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR anywhere else, which means we
    never enabled it for non-ACPI systems or ACPI systems that didn't supply
    hotplug parameters.
    
    That means errors reported below bridges were often never forwarded up to a
    Root Port where they could be signaled via AER.
    
    Enable PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR for all bridges so we can get better error
    reporting for downstream devices.
    
    Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com>
    [bhelgaas: changelog]
    Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

> Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/probe.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index b1c05b5..ed71e8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1841,8 +1841,6 @@ static void program_hpp_type0(struct pci_dev *dev, struct hpp_type0 *hpp)
>  		pci_write_config_byte(dev, PCI_SEC_LATENCY_TIMER,
>  				      hpp->latency_timer);
>  		pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, &pci_bctl);
> -		if (hpp->enable_serr)
> -			pci_bctl |= PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR;
>  		if (hpp->enable_perr)
>  			pci_bctl |= PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_PARITY;
>  		pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, pci_bctl);
> @@ -2114,6 +2112,23 @@ static void pci_configure_eetlp_prefix(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  #endif
>  }
>  
> +static void pci_configure_serr(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	if (dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) {
> +		u16 control;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * A Type-1 PCI bridge will not forward ERR_ messages coming
> +		 * from an endpoint if SERR# forwarding is not enabled.
> +		 */
> +		pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, &control);
> +		if (!(control & PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR)) {
> +			control |= PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR;
> +			pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, control);
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static void pci_configure_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  {
>  	struct hotplug_params hpp;
> @@ -2124,6 +2139,7 @@ static void pci_configure_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	pci_configure_relaxed_ordering(dev);
>  	pci_configure_ltr(dev);
>  	pci_configure_eetlp_prefix(dev);
> +	pci_configure_serr(dev);
>  
>  	memset(&hpp, 0, sizeof(hpp));
>  	ret = pci_get_hp_params(dev, &hpp);
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-02  0:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-14 14:47 [PATCH] PCI: Enable SERR# forwarding for Type-1 PCI devices Bharat Kumar Gogada
2018-12-06 15:47 ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2019-02-02  0:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190202004159.GX229773@google.com \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com \
    --cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=poza@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rgummal@xilinx.com \
    --cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).