linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xarray tree
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:15:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190212161528.GN12668@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190212162003.1aa1ffbd@canb.auug.org.au>

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 04:20:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Caused by commit
> 
>   a3e4d3f97ec8 ("XArray: Redesign xa_alloc API")
> 
> interacting with commits
> 
>   e59178d895af ("RDMA/devices: Use xarray to store the clients")
>   0df91bb67334 ("RDMA/devices: Use xarray to store the client_data")
> 
> from the rdma tree.
> 
> Its a bit of a pain modifying a published API like this :-(

Yes, it is.  I wasn't expecting people to actually start using it ;-)

Seriously, there are several defects in the published API which do
warrant a change.  The most severe one is that it's really easy to
forget to initialise the start index.  And while I'm making that change,
I should fix smaller things like the errno at the same time.

> I have added the following merge fixup patch for today (I assume some
> of the assignments are also now redundant).

I think the first of these should be using the alloc_cyclic API, like this:

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
index 283ecc2aee89..d0b56c70a553 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
@@ -586,20 +586,8 @@ static int assign_name(struct ib_device *device, const char *name)
 	}
 	strlcpy(device->name, dev_name(&device->dev), IB_DEVICE_NAME_MAX);
 
-	/* Cyclically allocate a user visible ID for the device */
-	device->index = last_id;
-	ret = xa_alloc(&devices, &device->index, device,
-		       XA_LIMIT(last_id, INT_MAX), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (ret == -ENOSPC) {
-		device->index = 0;
-		ret = xa_alloc(&devices, &device->index, device,
-			       XA_LIMIT(0, INT_MAX), GFP_KERNEL);
-	}
-	if (ret)
-		goto out;
-	last_id = device->index + 1;
-
-	ret = 0;
+	ret = xa_alloc_cyclic(&devices, &device->index, device, xa_limit_31b,
+			&last_id, GFP_KERNEL);
 
 out:
 	up_write(&devices_rwsem);
@@ -750,7 +738,7 @@ int ib_register_device(struct ib_device *device, const char *name)
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = assign_name(device, name);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
 	ret = setup_device(device);



  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-12 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-12  5:20 linux-next: build failure after merge of the xarray tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-12 16:15 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2019-02-12 16:23   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-13 21:26     ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-13 22:09       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-21 12:47         ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-21 17:40           ` Jason Gunthorpe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-10-08  6:55 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-08 14:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-10-08  6:50 Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-21  6:13 Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-21 12:34 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-02-21 12:48   ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-21 13:16     ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-02-21 13:23       ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-03-11  2:44   ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-03-11 12:13     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-03-11 12:31       ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-03-11 14:12         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-03-11 12:46     ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-06-18  3:27 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-18 16:50 ` Dan Williams
2018-06-18 17:09   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-27  3:09     ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190212161528.GN12668@bombadil.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).