linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org,
	uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] locking/rwsem: Remove rwsem-spinlock.c & use rwsem-xadd.c for all archs
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:47:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190220144756.GK7523@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1550095217-12047-3-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 05:00:16PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> Currently, we have two different implementation of rwsem:
>  1) CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK (rwsem-spinlock.c)
>  2) CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM (rwsem-xadd.c)
> 
> As we are going to use a single generic implementation for rwsem-xadd.c
> and no architecture-specific code will be needed, there is no point
> in keeping two different implementations of rwsem. In most cases, the
> performance of rwsem-spinlock.c will be worse. It also doesn't get all
> the performance tuning and optimizations that had been implemented in
> rwsem-xadd.c over the years.
> 
> For simplication, we are going to remove rwsem-spinlock.c and make all
> architectures use a single implementation of rwsem - rwsem-xadd.c.
> 
> All references to RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK and RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM
> in the code are removed.
> 
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/alpha/Kconfig              |   7 -
>  arch/arc/Kconfig                |   3 -
>  arch/arm/Kconfig                |   4 -
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig              |   3 -
>  arch/c6x/Kconfig                |   3 -
>  arch/csky/Kconfig               |   3 -
>  arch/h8300/Kconfig              |   3 -
>  arch/hexagon/Kconfig            |   6 -
>  arch/ia64/Kconfig               |   4 -
>  arch/m68k/Kconfig               |   7 -
>  arch/microblaze/Kconfig         |   6 -
>  arch/mips/Kconfig               |   7 -
>  arch/nds32/Kconfig              |   3 -
>  arch/nios2/Kconfig              |   3 -
>  arch/openrisc/Kconfig           |   6 -
>  arch/parisc/Kconfig             |   6 -
>  arch/powerpc/Kconfig            |   7 -
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig              |   3 -
>  arch/s390/Kconfig               |   6 -
>  arch/sh/Kconfig                 |   6 -
>  arch/sparc/Kconfig              |   8 -
>  arch/unicore32/Kconfig          |   6 -
>  arch/x86/Kconfig                |   3 -
>  arch/x86/um/Kconfig             |   6 -
>  arch/xtensa/Kconfig             |   3 -
>  include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h  |  47 ------
>  include/linux/rwsem.h           |   5 -
>  kernel/Kconfig.locks            |   2 +-
>  kernel/locking/Makefile         |   4 +-
>  kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c | 339 ----------------------------------------
>  kernel/locking/rwsem.h          |   3 -
>  31 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 520 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h
>  delete mode 100644 kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c

Another nice cleanup, and it looks like the optimistic spinning in the xadd
implementation is predicated on ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW, so we're all good
there too.

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Will

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-20 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-13 22:00 [PATCH v4 0/3] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 0 Waiman Long
2019-02-13 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files Waiman Long
2019-02-20 14:47   ` Will Deacon
2019-02-13 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] locking/rwsem: Remove rwsem-spinlock.c & use rwsem-xadd.c for all archs Waiman Long
2019-02-14 10:54   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-02-14 11:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-20 14:47   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2019-02-13 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock() Waiman Long
2019-02-21 14:14   ` Will Deacon
2019-02-22  3:28     ` Waiman Long
2019-02-14 10:37 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 0 Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-14 22:05   ` Waiman Long
2019-02-15 18:40   ` Will Deacon
2019-02-15 18:58     ` Waiman Long
2019-02-18 14:58       ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190220144756.GK7523@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org \
    --cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org \
    --cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).