linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: rrangel@chromium.org, Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org (open list:USB XHCI DRIVER),
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH] xhci: use iopoll for xhci_handshake
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 15:19:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190227221917.62567-1-djkurtz@chromium.org> (raw)

In cases such as xhci_abort_cmd_ring(), xhci_handshake() is called with
a spin lock held (and local interrupts disabled) with a huge 5 second
timeout.  This can translates to 5 million calls to udelay(1).  By its
very nature, udelay() is not meant to be precise, it only guarantees to
delay a minimum of 1 microsecond. Therefore the actual delay of
xhci_handshake() can be significantly longer.  If the average udelay(1)
is greater than 2.2 us, the total time in xhci_handshake() - with
interrupts disabled can be > 11 seconds triggering the kernel's soft lockup
detector.

To avoid this, let's replace the open coded io polling loop with one from
iopoll.h that uses a loop timed with the more presumably reliable ktime
infrastructure.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
index 005e65922608e..fde5ff84ba69b 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/dmi.h>
 #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
 
 #include "xhci.h"
 #include "xhci-trace.h"
@@ -69,18 +70,18 @@ static bool td_on_ring(struct xhci_td *td, struct xhci_ring *ring)
 int xhci_handshake(void __iomem *ptr, u32 mask, u32 done, int usec)
 {
 	u32	result;
+	int ret;
 
-	do {
-		result = readl(ptr);
-		if (result == ~(u32)0)		/* card removed */
-			return -ENODEV;
-		result &= mask;
-		if (result == done)
-			return 0;
-		udelay(1);
-		usec--;
-	} while (usec > 0);
-	return -ETIMEDOUT;
+	ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(ptr, result,
+			((result & mask) == done || (result == ~(u32)0)),
+			1, usec);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (result == ~(u32)0)		/* card removed */
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.21.0.rc2.261.ga7da99ff1b-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2019-02-27 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-27 22:19 Daniel Kurtz [this message]
2019-02-28  7:09 ` [PATCH] xhci: use iopoll for xhci_handshake Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-02-28  8:55   ` Mathias Nyman
2019-02-28 16:49   ` Daniel Kurtz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190227221917.62567-1-djkurtz@chromium.org \
    --to=djkurtz@chromium.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=rrangel@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).