From: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: rrangel@chromium.org, Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org (open list:USB XHCI DRIVER),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH] xhci: use iopoll for xhci_handshake
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 15:19:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190227221917.62567-1-djkurtz@chromium.org> (raw)
In cases such as xhci_abort_cmd_ring(), xhci_handshake() is called with
a spin lock held (and local interrupts disabled) with a huge 5 second
timeout. This can translates to 5 million calls to udelay(1). By its
very nature, udelay() is not meant to be precise, it only guarantees to
delay a minimum of 1 microsecond. Therefore the actual delay of
xhci_handshake() can be significantly longer. If the average udelay(1)
is greater than 2.2 us, the total time in xhci_handshake() - with
interrupts disabled can be > 11 seconds triggering the kernel's soft lockup
detector.
To avoid this, let's replace the open coded io polling loop with one from
iopoll.h that uses a loop timed with the more presumably reliable ktime
infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
index 005e65922608e..fde5ff84ba69b 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/dmi.h>
#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
#include "xhci.h"
#include "xhci-trace.h"
@@ -69,18 +70,18 @@ static bool td_on_ring(struct xhci_td *td, struct xhci_ring *ring)
int xhci_handshake(void __iomem *ptr, u32 mask, u32 done, int usec)
{
u32 result;
+ int ret;
- do {
- result = readl(ptr);
- if (result == ~(u32)0) /* card removed */
- return -ENODEV;
- result &= mask;
- if (result == done)
- return 0;
- udelay(1);
- usec--;
- } while (usec > 0);
- return -ETIMEDOUT;
+ ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(ptr, result,
+ ((result & mask) == done || (result == ~(u32)0)),
+ 1, usec);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (result == ~(u32)0) /* card removed */
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ return 0;
}
/*
--
2.21.0.rc2.261.ga7da99ff1b-goog
next reply other threads:[~2019-02-27 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-27 22:19 Daniel Kurtz [this message]
2019-02-28 7:09 ` [PATCH] xhci: use iopoll for xhci_handshake Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-02-28 8:55 ` Mathias Nyman
2019-02-28 16:49 ` Daniel Kurtz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190227221917.62567-1-djkurtz@chromium.org \
--to=djkurtz@chromium.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=rrangel@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).