From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822CCC43381 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 21:23:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452D220C01 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 21:23:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729406AbfB1VXR (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2019 16:23:17 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:54101 "EHLO relay4-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728045AbfB1VXQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2019 16:23:16 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 90.76.143.236 Received: from localhost (lfbn-1-2078-236.w90-76.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.76.143.236]) (Authenticated sender: antoine.tenart@bootlin.com) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B7DCE0003; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 21:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 22:23:12 +0100 From: Antoine Tenart To: David Miller Cc: antoine.tenart@bootlin.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com, gregory.clement@bootlin.com, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, nadavh@marvell.com, stefanc@marvell.com, ymarkman@marvell.com, mw@semihalf.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 14/15] net: mvpp2: set the XPCS and MPCS in reset when not used Message-ID: <20190228212312.GI4359@kwain> References: <20190228132128.30154-1-antoine.tenart@bootlin.com> <20190228132128.30154-15-antoine.tenart@bootlin.com> <20190228.104051.1946425715498350215.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20190228.104051.1946425715498350215.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi David, On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:40:51AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Antoine Tenart > Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 14:21:27 +0100 > > > +static void mvpp22_pcs_reset(struct mvpp2_port *port) > > +{ > > + struct mvpp2 *priv = port->priv; > > + void __iomem *mpcs = priv->iface_base + MVPP22_MPCS_BASE(port->gop_id); > > + void __iomem *xpcs = priv->iface_base + MVPP22_XPCS_BASE(port->gop_id); > > + u32 val; > > Reverse christmas tree please. > > ... > > +static void mvpp22_pcs_unreset(struct mvpp2_port *port) > > +{ > > + struct mvpp2 *priv = port->priv; > > + void __iomem *mpcs = priv->iface_base + MVPP22_MPCS_BASE(port->gop_id); > > + void __iomem *xpcs = priv->iface_base + MVPP22_XPCS_BASE(port->gop_id); > > + u32 val; > > Likewise. Right. But here we do need priv to be assigned first in order to assign mpcs and xpcs. Do you want the pointer definition and assignment to be in two steps to respect the christmas tree rule or is it acceptable in such situations? Thanks! Antoine -- Antoine Ténart, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com