linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Subject: [RFC patch 34/41] lockdep: Move stack trace logic into check_prev_add()
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:28:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190410103646.667572056@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20190410102754.387743324@linutronix.de

There is only one caller of check_prev_add() which hands in a zeroed struct
stack trace and a function pointer to save_stack(). Inside check_prev_add()
the stack_trace struct is checked for being empty, which is always
true. Based on that one code path stores a stack trace which is unused. The
comment there does not make sense either. It's all leftovers from
historical lockdep code.

Move the variable into check_prev_add() itself and cleanup the nonsensical
checks and the pointless stack trace recording.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c |   30 ++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -2158,10 +2158,10 @@ check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr,
  */
 static int
 check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
-	       struct held_lock *next, int distance, struct stack_trace *trace,
-	       int (*save)(struct stack_trace *trace))
+	       struct held_lock *next, int distance)
 {
 	struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry);
+	struct stack_trace trace;
 	struct lock_list *entry;
 	struct lock_list this;
 	int ret;
@@ -2196,17 +2196,8 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr,
 	this.class = hlock_class(next);
 	this.parent = NULL;
 	ret = check_noncircular(&this, hlock_class(prev), &target_entry);
-	if (unlikely(!ret)) {
-		if (!trace->entries) {
-			/*
-			 * If @save fails here, the printing might trigger
-			 * a WARN but because of the !nr_entries it should
-			 * not do bad things.
-			 */
-			save(trace);
-		}
+	if (unlikely(!ret))
 		return print_circular_bug(&this, target_entry, next, prev);
-	}
 	else if (unlikely(ret < 0))
 		return print_bfs_bug(ret);
 
@@ -2253,7 +2244,7 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr,
 		return print_bfs_bug(ret);
 
 
-	if (!trace->entries && !save(trace))
+	if (!save_trace(&trace))
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -2262,14 +2253,14 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr,
 	 */
 	ret = add_lock_to_list(hlock_class(next), hlock_class(prev),
 			       &hlock_class(prev)->locks_after,
-			       next->acquire_ip, distance, trace);
+			       next->acquire_ip, distance, &trace);
 
 	if (!ret)
 		return 0;
 
 	ret = add_lock_to_list(hlock_class(prev), hlock_class(next),
 			       &hlock_class(next)->locks_before,
-			       next->acquire_ip, distance, trace);
+			       next->acquire_ip, distance, &trace);
 	if (!ret)
 		return 0;
 
@@ -2287,12 +2278,6 @@ check_prevs_add(struct task_struct *curr
 {
 	int depth = curr->lockdep_depth;
 	struct held_lock *hlock;
-	struct stack_trace trace = {
-		.nr_entries = 0,
-		.max_entries = 0,
-		.entries = NULL,
-		.skip = 0,
-	};
 
 	/*
 	 * Debugging checks.
@@ -2318,7 +2303,8 @@ check_prevs_add(struct task_struct *curr
 		 * added:
 		 */
 		if (hlock->read != 2 && hlock->check) {
-			int ret = check_prev_add(curr, hlock, next, distance, &trace, save_trace);
+			int ret = check_prev_add(curr, hlock, next, distance);
+
 			if (!ret)
 				return 0;
 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-10 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-10 10:27 [RFC patch 00/41] stacktrace: Avoid the pointless redirection through struct stack_trace Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:27 ` [RFC patch 01/41] um/stacktrace: Remove the pointless ULONG_MAX marker Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:34   ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:27 ` [RFC patch 02/41] x86/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:34   ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:27 ` [RFC patch 03/41] arm/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:35   ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:27 ` [RFC patch 04/41] sh/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:36   ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:27 ` [RFC patch 05/41] unicore32/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:36   ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 06/41] riscv/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:37   ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 07/41] arm64/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:38   ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 08/41] parisc/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:38   ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 09/41] s390/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:39   ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 10/41] lockdep: Remove the ULONG_MAX stack trace hackery Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:40   ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 11/41] mm/slub: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:40   ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 12/41] mm/page_owner: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:41   ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 13/41] mm/kasan: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 11:31   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-04-14 20:42   ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 14/41] latency_top: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:42   ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 15/41] drm: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:43   ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 16/41] tracing: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-11  2:34   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-11  3:07     ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-14 20:44   ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 17/41] tracing: Make stack_trace_print() static and rename it Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 12:47   ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-11  0:19     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 18/41] stacktrace: Provide helpers for common stack trace operations Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 19/41] lib/stackdepot: Provide functions which operate on plain storage arrays Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 13:39   ` Alexander Potapenko
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 20/41] backtrace-test: Simplify stack trace handling Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-11  2:47   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 21/41] proc: Simplify task stack retrieval Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 14:49   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 22/41] latency_top: Simplify stack trace handling Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 23/41] mm/slub: Simplify stack trace retrieval Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 24/41] mm/kmemleak: Simplify stacktrace handling Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 25/41] mm/kasan: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 11:33   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-04-11  2:55   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-14 16:54     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 17:00       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 26/41] mm/page_owner: Simplify stack trace handling Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 27/41] fault-inject: Simplify stacktrace retrieval Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 28/41] dma/debug: Simplify stracktrace retrieval Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 11:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-10 12:08     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 12:25       ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-11 17:21       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 17:36         ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-11 17:44           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11  3:02   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-11  3:09     ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 29/41] btrfs: ref-verify: Simplify stack trace retrieval Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 11:31   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-04-10 12:05     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 12:38       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-04-10 12:50   ` David Sterba
2019-04-10 13:47   ` Alexander Potapenko
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 30/41] dm bufio: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 31/41] dm persistent data: Simplify stack trace handling Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 32/41] drm: Simplify stacktrace handling Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 33/41] lockdep: Remove unused trace argument from print_circular_bug() Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 35/41] lockdep: Simplify stack trace handling Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 36/41] tracing: Simplify stacktrace retrieval in histograms Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 37/41] tracing: Use percpu stack trace buffer more intelligently Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 38/41] tracing: Make ftrace_trace_userstack() static and conditional Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 39/41] tracing: Simplify stack trace retrieval Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 40/41] stacktrace: Remove obsolete functions Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-11  3:33   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-11  9:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-11 13:00     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 41/41] lib/stackdepot: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 13:49   ` Alexander Potapenko
2019-04-10 11:49 ` [RFC patch 00/41] stacktrace: Avoid the pointless redirection through struct stack_trace Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190410103646.667572056@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).