From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org>,
mingo@redhat.com, rui.zhang@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amit.kachhap@gmail.com,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, javi.merino@kernel.org,
edubezval@gmail.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org,
bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] Introduce Thermal Pressure
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 19:33:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190425173333.GA4081@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190424163424.GG4038@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 08:29:32PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Assuming PeterZ & Rafael & Quentin doesn't hate the whole thermal load
> > tracking approach.
>
> I seem to remember competing proposals, and have forgotten everything
> about them; the cover letter also didn't have references to them or
> mention them in any way.
>
> As to the averaging and period, I personally prefer a PELT signal with
> the windows lined up, if that really is too short a window, then a PELT
> like signal with a natural multiple of the PELT period would make sense,
> such that the windows still line up nicely.
>
> Mixing different averaging methods and non-aligned windows just makes me
> uncomfortable.
Yeah, so the problem with PELT is that while it nicely approximates
variable-period decay calculations with plain additions, shifts and table
lookups (i.e. accelerates pow()), AFAICS the most important decay
parameter is fixed: the speed of decay, the dampening factor, which is
fixed at 32:
Documentation/scheduler/sched-pelt.c
#define HALFLIFE 32
Right?
Thara's numbers suggest that there's high sensitivity to the speed of
decay. By using PELT we'd be using whatever averaging speed there is
within PELT.
Now we could make that parametric of course, but that would both
complicate the PELT lookup code (one more dimension) and would negatively
affect code generation in a number of places.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-25 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-16 19:38 [PATCH V2 0/3] Introduce Thermal Pressure Thara Gopinath
2019-04-16 19:38 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] Calculate " Thara Gopinath
2019-04-18 10:14 ` Quentin Perret
2019-04-24 4:13 ` Thara Gopinath
2019-04-24 16:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-24 16:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-25 10:57 ` Quentin Perret
2019-04-25 12:45 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-04-25 12:47 ` Quentin Perret
2019-04-26 14:17 ` Thara Gopinath
2019-05-08 12:41 ` Quentin Perret
2019-04-16 19:38 ` [PATCH V2 2/3] sched/fair: update cpu_capcity to reflect thermal pressure Thara Gopinath
2019-04-16 19:38 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] thermal/cpu-cooling: Update thermal pressure in case of a maximum frequency capping Thara Gopinath
2019-04-18 9:48 ` Quentin Perret
2019-04-23 22:38 ` Thara Gopinath
2019-04-24 15:56 ` Ionela Voinescu
2019-04-26 10:24 ` Thara Gopinath
2019-04-25 10:45 ` Quentin Perret
2019-04-25 12:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-04-25 12:50 ` Quentin Perret
2019-04-26 13:47 ` Thara Gopinath
2019-04-24 16:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-17 5:36 ` [PATCH V2 0/3] Introduce Thermal Pressure Ingo Molnar
2019-04-17 5:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-17 17:28 ` Thara Gopinath
2019-04-17 17:18 ` Thara Gopinath
2019-04-17 18:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-18 0:07 ` Thara Gopinath
2019-04-18 9:22 ` Quentin Perret
2019-04-24 16:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-25 17:33 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2019-04-25 17:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-26 7:08 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-04-26 8:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-24 15:57 ` Ionela Voinescu
2019-04-26 11:50 ` Thara Gopinath
2019-04-26 14:46 ` Ionela Voinescu
2019-04-29 13:29 ` Ionela Voinescu
2019-04-30 14:39 ` Ionela Voinescu
2019-04-30 16:10 ` Thara Gopinath
2019-05-02 10:44 ` Ionela Voinescu
2019-04-30 15:57 ` Thara Gopinath
2019-04-30 16:02 ` Thara Gopinath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190425173333.GA4081@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=amit.kachhap@gmail.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=javi.merino@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=thara.gopinath@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).