linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
	Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
	Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/16] sched/core: Allow sched_setattr() to use the current policy
Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 15:59:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190509145901.um7rrsslg7de4blf@e110439-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190508192131.GD32547@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 08-May 21:21, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:41:41AM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/sched.h b/include/uapi/linux/sched.h
> > index 22627f80063e..075c610adf45 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@
> >  /* SCHED_ISO: reserved but not implemented yet */
> >  #define SCHED_IDLE		5
> >  #define SCHED_DEADLINE		6
> > +/* Must be the last entry: used to sanity check attr.policy values */
> > +#define SCHED_POLICY_MAX	SCHED_DEADLINE
> 
> This is a wee bit sad to put in a uapi header; but yeah, where else :/
> 
> Another option would be something like:
> 
> enum {
> 	SCHED_NORMAL = 0,
> 	SCHED_FIFO = 1,
> 	SCHED_RR = 2,
> 	SCHED_BATCH = 3,
> 	/* SCHED_ISO = 4, reserved */
> 	SCHED_IDLE = 5,
> 	SCHED_DEADLINE = 6,
> 	SCHED_POLICY_NR
> };
> 
> >  /* Can be ORed in to make sure the process is reverted back to SCHED_NORMAL on fork */
> >  #define SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK     0x40000000
> > @@ -50,9 +52,11 @@
> >  #define SCHED_FLAG_RESET_ON_FORK	0x01
> >  #define SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM		0x02
> >  #define SCHED_FLAG_DL_OVERRUN		0x04
> > +#define SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY		0x08
> >  
> >  #define SCHED_FLAG_ALL	(SCHED_FLAG_RESET_ON_FORK	| \
> >  			 SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM		| \
> > -			 SCHED_FLAG_DL_OVERRUN)
> > +			 SCHED_FLAG_DL_OVERRUN		| \
> > +			 SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY)
> >  
> >  #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_SCHED_H */
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index d368ac26b8aa..20efb32e1a7e 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -4907,8 +4907,17 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(sched_setattr, pid_t, pid, struct sched_attr __user *, uattr,
> >  	if (retval)
> >  		return retval;
> >  
> > -	if ((int)attr.sched_policy < 0)
> > +	/*
> > +	 * A valid policy is always required from userspace, unless
> > +	 * SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY is set and the current policy
> > +	 * is enforced for this call.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (attr.sched_policy > SCHED_POLICY_MAX &&
> > +	    !(attr.sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY)) {
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> 
> And given I just looked at those darn SCHED_* things, I now note the
> above does 'funny' things when passed: attr.policy=4.

Looking better at the code, I see now that we don't really need that
check anymore. Indeed, v8 introduced the support to change policy
specific and independent attributes at the same time. Thus:

1. the policy validity is already checked in:

     sched_setattr()
       sched_setattr()
         __sched_setscheduler()
            valid_policy()

   which knows how to deal with attr.policy=4 (i.e. -EINVAL)

2. when we pass in SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY we force the current policy
   by setting attr.sched_policy = SETPARAM_POLICY, so we just need a
   non negative policy being defined (usually 0 by default).

Thus, I'll remove the new #define and update the check above to be just:

	if (attr.sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY)
		attr.sched_policy = SETPARAM_POLICY;
	else if ((int)attr.sched_policy < 0)
		return -EINVAL;

which should cover the additional case:

   you can syscall with just SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY set if you want to
   change only cross-policy attributes.

> > +	if (attr.sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY)
> > +		attr.sched_policy = SETPARAM_POLICY;
> >  
> >  	rcu_read_lock();
> >  	retval = -ESRCH;

-- 
#include <best/regards.h>

Patrick Bellasi

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-09 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-02 10:41 [PATCH v8 00/16] Add utilization clamping support Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 01/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add CPU's clamp buckets refcounting Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-06 23:51   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-04-08 11:49     ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 02/16] sched/core: Add bucket local max tracking Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-15 14:51   ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 03/16] sched/core: uclamp: Enforce last task's UCLAMP_MAX Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-17 20:36   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-05-07 10:10     ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 04/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add system default clamps Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-18  0:51   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-05-07 10:38     ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-08 18:42   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09  8:43     ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-08 19:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09  8:45     ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-08 19:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-08 19:15     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09  9:10       ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-09 11:53         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 13:04           ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 05/16] sched/core: Allow sched_setattr() to use the current policy Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-08 19:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09  9:18     ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-09 11:55       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 14:59     ` Patrick Bellasi [this message]
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 06/16] sched/core: uclamp: Extend sched_setattr() to support utilization clamping Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-17 22:26   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-05-07 11:13     ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-08 19:44       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09  9:24         ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-08 19:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09  9:23     ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 07/16] sched/core: uclamp: Reset uclamp values on RESET_ON_FORK Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 08/16] sched/core: uclamp: Set default clamps for RT tasks Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-17 23:07   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-05-07 11:25     ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 09/16] sched/cpufreq: uclamp: Add clamps for FAIR and " Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 10/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add uclamp_util_with() Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 11/16] sched/fair: uclamp: Add uclamp support to energy_compute() Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-09 12:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 12/16] sched/core: uclamp: Extend CPU's cgroup controller Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-18  0:12   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-05-07 11:42     ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 13/16] sched/core: uclamp: Propagate parent clamps Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 14/16] sched/core: uclamp: Propagate system defaults to root group Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 15/16] sched/core: uclamp: Use TG's clamps to restrict TASK's clamps Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 16/16] sched/core: uclamp: Update CPU's refcount on TG's clamp changes Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-09 13:02 ` [PATCH v8 00/16] Add utilization clamping support Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 13:09   ` Patrick Bellasi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190509145901.um7rrsslg7de4blf@e110439-lin \
    --to=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=smuckle@google.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tkjos@google.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).