From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
aarcange@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
christian@brauner.io, davem@davemloft.net, ebiederm@xmission.com,
elena.reshetova@intel.com, guro@fb.com, hch@infradead.org,
james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
jglisse@redhat.com, keescook@chromium.org, ldv@altlinux.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, luto@amacapital.net,
mhocko@suse.com, mingo@kernel.org, namit@vmware.com,
peterz@infradead.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, wad@chromium.org
Subject: Re: RFC: call_rcu_outstanding (was Re: WARNING in __mmdrop)
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 14:08:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190721210837.GC363@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190721131725.GR14271@linux.ibm.com>
On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 06:17:25AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Also, the overhead is important. For example, as far as I know,
> current RCU gracefully handles close(open(...)) in a tight userspace
> loop. But there might be trouble due to tight userspace loops around
> lighter-weight operations.
I thought you believed that RCU was antifragile, in that it would scale
better as it was used more heavily?
Would it make sense to have call_rcu() check to see if there are many
outstanding requests on this CPU and if so process them before returning?
That would ensure that frequent callers usually ended up doing their
own processing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-21 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-19 3:35 WARNING in __mmdrop syzbot
2019-07-20 10:08 ` syzbot
2019-07-21 10:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-21 12:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-22 5:24 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-22 8:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-23 4:01 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-23 5:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-23 5:47 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-23 7:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-23 7:53 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-23 8:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-23 8:49 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-23 9:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-23 13:31 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-25 5:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-25 7:43 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-25 8:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-25 13:21 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-25 13:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-25 14:25 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-26 11:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-26 12:00 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-26 12:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-26 12:53 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-26 13:36 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-26 13:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-29 5:54 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-29 8:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-29 14:24 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-29 14:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-30 7:44 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-30 8:03 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-30 15:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-31 8:49 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-31 23:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-26 13:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-26 14:00 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-26 14:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-26 15:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-29 5:56 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-21 12:28 ` RFC: call_rcu_outstanding (was Re: WARNING in __mmdrop) Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-21 13:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-07-21 17:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-21 19:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-07-22 7:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-22 11:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-07-21 21:08 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2019-07-21 23:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-07-22 7:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-22 11:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-07-22 13:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-22 15:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-07-22 16:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-22 16:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-22 16:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-07-22 15:14 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-07-22 15:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-22 15:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-07-22 16:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-22 16:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-07-22 16:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-22 18:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-07-22 5:21 ` WARNING in __mmdrop Jason Wang
2019-07-22 8:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-23 3:55 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-23 5:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-23 5:48 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-23 7:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-23 7:55 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-23 7:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-23 8:42 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-23 10:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-23 13:34 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-23 15:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-24 2:17 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-24 8:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-24 10:08 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-24 18:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-25 3:44 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-25 5:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-24 16:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-24 18:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-23 10:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-23 13:37 ` Jason Wang
2019-07-22 14:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-25 6:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-25 7:44 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190721210837.GC363@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=ldv@altlinux.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).