From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm_pmu: Mark expected switch fall-through
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 14:06:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190726130641.dp3qrvyhsote5iu3@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190726122956.GC26088@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 01:29:56PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 01:27:37PM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > When fall-through warnings was enabled by default the following warning
> > was starting to show up:
> >
> > ../drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c: In function ‘cpu_pm_pmu_notify’:
> > ../drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c:726:3: warning: this statement may fall
> > through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> > cpu_pm_pmu_setup(armpmu, cmd);
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > ../drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c:727:2: note: here
> > case CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED:
> > ^~~~
> >
> > Rework so that the compiler doesn't warn about fall-through.
> >
> > Fixes: d93512ef0f0e ("Makefile: Globally enable fall-through warning")
> > Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >
> > I'm not convinced that this is the correct patch to fix this issue.
> > However, I can't see why we do 'armpmu->start(armpmu);' only in 'case
> > CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED' and why we not call function cpu_pm_pmu_setup()
> > there also, since in cpu_pm_pmu_setup() has a case prepared for
> > CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED.
>
> I agree, think that should be:
>
> case CPU_PM_EXIT:
> case CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED:
> cpu_pm_pmu_setup(armpmu, cmd);
> armpmu->start(armpmu);
> break;
>
> ... so that we re-start the events before we start the PMU.
>
> That would be a fix for commit:
>
> da4e4f18afe0f372 ("drivers/perf: arm_pmu: implement CPU_PM notifier")
Does seem about right, but I'd like Lorenzo's ack on this.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-26 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-26 11:27 [PATCH] arm_pmu: Mark expected switch fall-through Anders Roxell
2019-07-26 12:29 ` Mark Rutland
2019-07-26 13:06 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2019-07-26 15:18 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-07-30 11:24 ` Mark Rutland
2019-07-30 11:27 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-30 11:42 ` Mark Rutland
2019-07-30 12:30 ` Anders Roxell
2019-07-30 12:43 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-30 15:21 ` Anders Roxell
2019-07-28 23:53 [PATCH] arm_pmu: mark " Matteo Croce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190726130641.dp3qrvyhsote5iu3@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).