From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BB1C433FF for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3D920644 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730857AbfG3Lmg (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 07:42:36 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:59660 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725947AbfG3Lmg (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 07:42:36 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6770428; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 04:42:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakrids.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 987123F575; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 04:42:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:42:32 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Will Deacon Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Anders Roxell , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm_pmu: Mark expected switch fall-through Message-ID: <20190730114232.GC51922@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20190726112737.19309-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org> <20190726122956.GC26088@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> <20190726151825.GA12552@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20190730112415.GB51922@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> <20190730112758.ctgg6l5gldsefdgs@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20190730112758.ctgg6l5gldsefdgs@willie-the-truck> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1+11 (2f07cb52) (2018-12-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:27:59PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:24:15PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 04:18:25PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 01:29:56PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 01:27:37PM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote: > > > > > When fall-through warnings was enabled by default the following warning > > > > > was starting to show up: > > > > > > > > > > ../drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c: In function ‘cpu_pm_pmu_notify’: > > > > > ../drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c:726:3: warning: this statement may fall > > > > > through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > > > > > cpu_pm_pmu_setup(armpmu, cmd); > > > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > ../drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c:727:2: note: here > > > > > case CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED: > > > > > ^~~~ > > > > > > > > > > Rework so that the compiler doesn't warn about fall-through. > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: d93512ef0f0e ("Makefile: Globally enable fall-through warning") > > > > > Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > I'm not convinced that this is the correct patch to fix this issue. > > > > > However, I can't see why we do 'armpmu->start(armpmu);' only in 'case > > > > > CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED' and why we not call function cpu_pm_pmu_setup() > > > > > there also, since in cpu_pm_pmu_setup() has a case prepared for > > > > > CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED. > > > > > > > > I agree, think that should be: > > > > > > > > case CPU_PM_EXIT: > > > > case CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED: > > > > cpu_pm_pmu_setup(armpmu, cmd); > > > > armpmu->start(armpmu); > > > > break; > > > > > > > > ... so that we re-start the events before we start the PMU. > > > > > > > > That would be a fix for commit: > > > > > > > > da4e4f18afe0f372 ("drivers/perf: arm_pmu: implement CPU_PM notifier") > > > > > > Yes that's correct, apologies. Probably we did not hit it because CPU PM > > > notifier entry failures are a pretty rare event; regardless: > > > > > > Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi > > > > > > I can send the updated fix, just let me know. > > > > I'm not sure what Will wants, but assuming you do so: > > > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland > > I gave up waiting, so it's already queued here: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next/fixes&id=0d7fd70f26039bd4b33444ca47f0e69ce3ae0354 Great; I'll mark this thread as done, then. :) Mark.