From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Zi Yan <zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu>,
Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@profihost.ag>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "mm, thp: restore node-local hugepage allocations"
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 10:17:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190731081726.GB9330@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190730110544.84d91ba80365cf35f5aae291@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue 30-07-19 11:05:44, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 15:11:27 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu 23-05-19 17:57:37, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > [...]
> > > It does appear to me that this patch does more good than harm for the
> > > totality of kernel users, so I'm inclined to push it through and to try
> > > to talk Linus out of reverting it again.
> >
> > What is the status here?
>
> I doesn't seem that the mooted alternatives will be happening any time
> soon,
>
> I would like a version of this patch which has a changelog which fully
> describes our reasons for reapplying the reverted revert.
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190503223146.2312-3-aarcange@redhat.com went
in great details IMHO about the previous decision as well as adverse
effect on swapout. Do you have any suggestions on what is missing there?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-31 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-03 22:31 [PATCH 0/2] reapply: relax __GFP_THISNODE for MADV_HUGEPAGE mappings Andrea Arcangeli
2019-05-03 22:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "Revert "mm, thp: consolidate THP gfp handling into alloc_hugepage_direct_gfpmask"" Andrea Arcangeli
2019-05-04 12:03 ` Michal Hocko
2019-05-03 22:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] Revert "mm, thp: restore node-local hugepage allocations" Andrea Arcangeli
2019-05-04 12:11 ` Michal Hocko
2019-05-09 8:38 ` Mel Gorman
2019-05-15 20:26 ` David Rientjes
2019-05-20 15:36 ` Mel Gorman
2019-05-20 17:54 ` David Rientjes
2019-05-24 0:57 ` Andrew Morton
2019-05-24 20:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-05-29 2:06 ` David Rientjes
2019-05-29 21:24 ` David Rientjes
2019-05-31 9:22 ` Michal Hocko
2019-05-31 21:53 ` David Rientjes
2019-06-05 9:32 ` Michal Hocko
2019-06-06 22:12 ` David Rientjes
2019-06-07 8:32 ` Michal Hocko
2019-06-13 20:17 ` David Rientjes
2019-06-21 21:16 ` David Rientjes
2019-07-30 13:11 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-30 18:05 ` Andrew Morton
2019-07-31 8:17 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-05-24 10:07 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190731081726.GB9330@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).