linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Steve Magnani <steve.magnani@digidescorp.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Steve Magnani <steve@digidescorp.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udf: prevent allocation beyond UDF partition
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:59:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190731095901.GC15806@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1564341552-129750-1-git-send-email-steve@digidescorp.com>

On Sun 28-07-19 14:19:12, Steve Magnani wrote:
> The UDF bitmap allocation code assumes that a recorded 
> Unallocated Space Bitmap is compliant with ECMA-167 4/13,
> which requires that pad bytes between the end of the bitmap 
> and the end of a logical block are all zero.
> 
> When a recorded bitmap does not comply with this requirement,
> for example one padded with FF to the block boundary instead
> of 00, the allocator may "allocate" blocks that are outside
> the UDF partition extent. This can result in UDF volume descriptors
> being overwritten by file data or by partition-level descriptors,
> and in extreme cases, even in scribbling on a subsequent disk partition.
> 
> Add a check that the block selected by the allocator actually
> resides within the UDF partition extent.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven J. Magnani <steve@digidescorp.com>

Thanks for the patch! Added to my tree. I've just slightly modified the
patch to also output error message about filesystem corruption.

								Honza

> 
> --- a/fs/udf/balloc.c	2019-07-26 11:35:28.249563705 -0500
> +++ b/fs/udf/balloc.c	2019-07-28 13:11:25.061431597 -0500
> @@ -325,6 +325,13 @@ got_block:
>  	newblock = bit + (block_group << (sb->s_blocksize_bits + 3)) -
>  		(sizeof(struct spaceBitmapDesc) << 3);
>  
> +	if (newblock >= sbi->s_partmaps[partition].s_partition_len) {
> +		/* Ran off the end of the bitmap,
> +		 * and bits following are non-compliant (not all zero)
> +		 */
> +		goto error_return;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (!udf_clear_bit(bit, bh->b_data)) {
>  		udf_debug("bit already cleared for block %d\n", bit);
>  		goto repeat;
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-31  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-28 19:19 [PATCH] udf: prevent allocation beyond UDF partition Steve Magnani
2019-07-31  9:59 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2019-07-31 14:06   ` Steve Magnani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190731095901.GC15806@quack2.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steve.magnani@digidescorp.com \
    --cc=steve@digidescorp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).