linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Bernard Metzler <BMT@zurich.ibm.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/siw: Fix compiler warnings on 32-bit due to u64/pointer abuse
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:22:08 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190819222208.GA25513@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF399EF474.834C3102-ON0025845B.006D75AA-0025845B.007708F2@notes.na.collabserv.com>

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:40:10PM +0000, Bernard Metzler wrote:

> >It is either an iova & lkey pair, or SGE information is inlined into
> >the WR ring.
> >
> In siw, the reference to any type of memory is kept uninterpreted
> in the send/receive queue until it gets accessed by a data
> transfer. The information on what type of memory is being referenced
> is deducted from the local memory key. As said, this step is
> being executed only when the actual buffer is to be touched.
> All it needs before that translation is to keep the 32bit key +
> length and the up to 64bit address in a work queue element within
> the send queue.
> lkey lookup and memory translation + access validation happens
> after the work queue element left the send/receive queue and a
> local copy of it is being processed by the kernel driver
> during RX or TX operations.
> 
> Inline data is implemented similar to how HW providers do
> it - user data are copied immediately into the WR array.

I still don't understand how kernel void *'s are getting into WQEs.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-19 22:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-19 10:05 [PATCH] RDMA/siw: Fix compiler warnings on 32-bit due to u64/pointer abuse Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-19 12:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-19 13:36 ` Bernard Metzler
2019-08-19 13:52   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-19 14:15   ` Bernard Metzler
2019-08-19 14:18     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-19 14:52     ` Bernard Metzler
2019-08-19 15:07       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-19 15:54       ` Bernard Metzler
2019-08-19 16:05         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-19 16:29         ` Bernard Metzler
2019-08-19 16:35           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-19 17:39           ` Bernard Metzler
2019-08-19 18:00             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-19 21:40             ` Bernard Metzler
2019-08-19 22:22               ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-08-19 16:56 ` Joe Perches
2019-08-19 17:14   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-27 14:17     ` David Laight
2019-08-27 17:29       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-27 17:46         ` Al Viro
2019-08-27 17:59           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-27 18:33             ` Joe Perches
2019-08-28  8:27               ` David Laight
2019-08-19 17:26   ` Bernard Metzler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190819222208.GA25513@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=BMT@zurich.ibm.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).