linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
	Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] make use of gcc 9's "asm inline()"
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 20:42:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190829184222.GE1312@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgZ7Ge8QUkkSZLCfJBsHRsre65DkfTyZ2Kt5VPwa=dkuA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:15:04AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Un-inlining a function because it contains a single inline asm
> instruction is not productive. Yes, it might result in a smaller
> binary over-all (because all those other non-code sections do take up
> some space), but it actually results in a bigger code footprint.

... and also, like one of the gcc guys said at the time, we should be
careful when using this asm inlining, because, well, if we inline it
everywhere just like always_inline functions and the code footprint
grows considerably, then we get what we deserve.

So the onus is on us to keep such sequences small.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-29 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-29  8:32 [RFC PATCH 0/5] make use of gcc 9's "asm inline()" Rasmus Villemoes
2019-08-29  8:32 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] treewide: replace __inline__ by inline Rasmus Villemoes
2019-08-29 16:29   ` Joe Perches
2019-08-29  8:32 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] compiler_types.h: don't #define __inline__ Rasmus Villemoes
2019-08-29  8:32 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] compiler-gcc.h: add asm_inline definition Rasmus Villemoes
2019-08-29  8:32 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] x86: alternative.h: use asm_inline for all alternative variants Rasmus Villemoes
2019-08-29  8:32 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] x86: bug.h: use asm_inline in _BUG_FLAGS definitions Rasmus Villemoes
2019-08-29 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] make use of gcc 9's "asm inline()" Linus Torvalds
2019-08-30  7:45   ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-08-29 17:36 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-29 18:15   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-08-29 18:26     ` Nadav Amit
2019-08-29 18:42     ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2019-08-29 19:41   ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-08-30 23:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-08-30 23:15   ` [PATCH v2 1/6] staging: rtl8723bs: replace __inline by inline Rasmus Villemoes
2019-09-04 23:54     ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-30 23:15   ` [PATCH v2 2/6] lib/zstd/mem.h: " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-09-04 23:59     ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-05  0:07       ` Miguel Ojeda
2019-09-05  9:28         ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-08-30 23:15   ` [PATCH v2 3/6] compiler_types.h: don't #define __inline Rasmus Villemoes
2019-09-05  0:13     ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-05  9:45       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-08-30 23:15   ` [PATCH v2 4/6] compiler-gcc.h: add asm_inline definition Rasmus Villemoes
2019-09-05  0:18     ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-05  5:43       ` Nadav Amit
2019-09-05 11:07       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-09-05 13:45         ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-09-05 14:23           ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-09-05 14:47             ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-09-05 15:52           ` Miguel Ojeda
2019-09-05 16:13             ` Miguel Ojeda
2019-09-06 12:23             ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-09-06 15:13               ` Miguel Ojeda
2019-09-06 16:30                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-09-06 16:39                   ` Jakub Jelinek
2019-09-06 18:14                     ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-06 22:03                       ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-09-06 22:35                         ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-06 22:56                           ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-09-06 23:42                             ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-07  0:14                               ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-09-07  1:04                                 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-07 13:11                                   ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-09-08 13:55                                     ` Miguel Ojeda
2019-09-12 21:54                                     ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-12 22:12                                       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-09-20  0:50                                       ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-09-06 16:47                   ` Miguel Ojeda
2019-08-30 23:15   ` [PATCH v2 5/6] x86: alternative.h: use asm_inline for all alternative variants Rasmus Villemoes
2019-08-30 23:15   ` [PATCH v2 6/6] x86: bug.h: use asm_inline in _BUG_FLAGS definitions Rasmus Villemoes
2019-09-12 22:19   ` [PATCH v3 0/6] make use of gcc 9's "asm inline()" Rasmus Villemoes
2019-09-12 22:19     ` [PATCH v3 1/6] staging: rtl8723bs: replace __inline by inline Rasmus Villemoes
2019-09-29 10:40       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-09-12 22:19     ` [PATCH v3 2/6] lib/zstd/mem.h: " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-09-12 22:19     ` [PATCH v3 3/6] compiler_types.h: don't #define __inline Rasmus Villemoes
2019-09-12 22:19     ` [PATCH v3 4/6] compiler-types.h: add asm_inline definition Rasmus Villemoes
2019-09-12 22:19     ` [PATCH v3 5/6] x86: alternative.h: use asm_inline for all alternative variants Rasmus Villemoes
2019-09-13  5:41       ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-12 22:19     ` [PATCH v3 6/6] x86: bug.h: use asm_inline in _BUG_FLAGS definitions Rasmus Villemoes
2019-09-13  5:42       ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-12 22:30     ` [PATCH v3 0/6] make use of gcc 9's "asm inline()" Miguel Ojeda
2019-09-13  6:11       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-09-13 15:21         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-09-15 18:20           ` Miguel Ojeda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190829184222.GE1312@zn.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).