From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
Yong Mao <yong.mao@mediatek.com>,
Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] mmc: core: Add helper function to indicate if SDIO IRQs is enabled
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 16:58:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190904235836.GG70797@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190903142207.5825-2-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Hi Ulf,
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 04:21:57PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> To avoid each host driver supporting SDIO IRQs, from keeping track
> internally about if SDIO IRQs has been enabled, let's introduce a common
> helper function, sdio_irq_enabled().
>
> The function returns true if SDIO IRQs are enabled, via using the
> information about the number of claimed irqs. This is safe, even without
> any locks, as long as the helper function is called only from
> runtime/system suspend callbacks of the host driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> ---
> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> index 4a351cb7f20f..0c0a565c7ff1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> @@ -493,6 +493,15 @@ void mmc_command_done(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq);
>
> void mmc_cqe_request_done(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq);
>
> +/*
> + * May be called from host driver's system/runtime suspend/resume callbacks,
> + * to know if SDIO IRQs has been enabled.
> +*/
> +static inline bool sdio_irq_enabled(struct mmc_host *host)
> +{
> + return host->sdio_irqs > 0;
> +}
> +
The name of the function is a bit misleadling, since it indicates
if SDIO IRQs should be enabled, not whether they are actually enabled
by the host. The resulting code can look a bit confusing to the
uninstructed reader:
if (sdio_irq_enabled(host->slot->mmc))
__dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(host->slot, 1);
aka 'if SDIO IRQ is enabled, enable SDIO IRQ'.
sdio_irqs_claimed() could be a possible alternative.
No biggie though, just something I noticed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-04 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-03 14:21 [PATCH 00/11] mmc: core: PM fixes/improvements for SDIO IRQs Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 01/11] mmc: core: Add helper function to indicate if SDIO IRQs is enabled Ulf Hansson
2019-09-04 23:58 ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2019-09-05 7:28 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 02/11] mmc: dw_mmc: Re-store SDIO IRQs mask at system resume Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 0:14 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-05 7:29 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 17:01 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-05 23:47 ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-06 9:19 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-06 21:37 ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 03/11] mmc: mtk-sd: " Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 04/11] mmc: core: Move code to get pending SDIO IRQs to a function Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 05/11] mmc: core: Clarify sdio_irq_pending flag for MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 0:34 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-05 7:29 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 23:47 ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-06 9:19 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-06 21:30 ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-08 9:11 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 06/11] mmc: core: Clarify that the ->ack_sdio_irq() callback is mandatory Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 17:33 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 07/11] mmc: core: WARN if SDIO IRQs are enabled for non-powered card in suspend Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 17:38 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 08/11] mmc: core: Fixup processing of SDIO IRQs during system suspend/resume Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 18:43 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-06 9:42 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 23:48 ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-06 9:42 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 09/11] mmc: sdhci: Drop redundant check in sdhci_ack_sdio_irq() Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 18:57 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 10/11] mmc: sdhci: Drop redundant code for SDIO IRQs Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 11/11] mmc: sdhci: Convert to use sdio_irq_enabled() Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 19:02 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190904235836.GG70797@google.com \
--to=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=chaotian.jing@mediatek.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=yong.mao@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).