linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Andrew Murray <Andrew.Murray@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 33/35] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Add direct injection capability to SGI registers
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 19:26:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190923182606.32100-34-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190923182606.32100-1-maz@kernel.org>

Most of the GICv3 emulation code that deals with SGIs now has to be
aware of the v4.1 capabilities in order to benefit from it.

Add such support, keyed on the interrupt having the hw flag set and
being a SGI.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c | 15 +++++-
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c    | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
index 7dfd15dbb308..d73f4ffd7d36 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
 #include <linux/kvm.h>
 #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <kvm/iodev.h>
 #include <kvm/arm_vgic.h>
 
@@ -939,8 +940,18 @@ void vgic_v3_dispatch_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 reg, bool allow_group1)
 		 * generate interrupts of either group.
 		 */
 		if (!irq->group || allow_group1) {
-			irq->pending_latch = true;
-			vgic_queue_irq_unlock(vcpu->kvm, irq, flags);
+			if (!irq->hw) {
+				irq->pending_latch = true;
+				vgic_queue_irq_unlock(vcpu->kvm, irq, flags);
+			} else {
+				/* HW SGI? Ask the GIC to inject it */
+				int err;
+				err = irq_set_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq,
+							    IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING,
+							    true);
+				WARN_RATELIMIT(err, "IRQ %d", irq->host_irq);
+				raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+			}
 		} else {
 			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
 		}
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c
index 0d090482720d..6ebf747a7806 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
 
 #include <linux/bitops.h>
 #include <linux/bsearch.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
 #include <linux/kvm.h>
 #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
 #include <kvm/iodev.h>
@@ -59,6 +61,11 @@ unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_group(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return value;
 }
 
+static void vgic_update_vsgi(struct vgic_irq *irq)
+{
+	WARN_ON(its_prop_update_vsgi(irq->host_irq, irq->priority, irq->group));
+}
+
 void vgic_mmio_write_group(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t addr,
 			   unsigned int len, unsigned long val)
 {
@@ -71,7 +78,12 @@ void vgic_mmio_write_group(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t addr,
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
 		irq->group = !!(val & BIT(i));
-		vgic_queue_irq_unlock(vcpu->kvm, irq, flags);
+		if (irq->hw && vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid)) {
+			vgic_update_vsgi(irq);
+			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+		} else {
+			vgic_queue_irq_unlock(vcpu->kvm, irq, flags);
+		}
 
 		vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
 	}
@@ -113,7 +125,21 @@ void vgic_mmio_write_senable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, intid + i);
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
-		if (vgic_irq_is_mapped_level(irq)) {
+		if (irq->hw && vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid)) {
+			if (!irq->enabled) {
+				struct irq_data *data;
+
+				irq->enabled = true;
+				data = &irq_to_desc(irq->host_irq)->irq_data;
+				while (irqd_irq_disabled(data))
+					enable_irq(irq->host_irq);
+			}
+
+			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+			vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
+
+			continue;
+		} else if (vgic_irq_is_mapped_level(irq)) {
 			bool was_high = irq->line_level;
 
 			/*
@@ -148,6 +174,8 @@ void vgic_mmio_write_cenable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, intid + i);
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+		if (irq->hw && vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid) && irq->enabled)
+			disable_irq_nosync(irq->host_irq);
 
 		irq->enabled = false;
 
@@ -167,10 +195,22 @@ unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	for (i = 0; i < len * 8; i++) {
 		struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, intid + i);
 		unsigned long flags;
+		bool val;
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
-		if (irq_is_pending(irq))
-			value |= (1U << i);
+		if (irq->hw && vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid)) {
+			int err;
+
+			val = false;
+			err = irq_get_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq,
+						    IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING,
+						    &val);
+			WARN_RATELIMIT(err, "IRQ %d", irq->host_irq);
+		} else {
+			val = irq_is_pending(irq);
+		}
+
+		value |= ((u32)val << i);
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
 
 		vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
@@ -236,6 +276,21 @@ void vgic_mmio_write_spending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		}
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+
+		if (irq->hw && vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid)) {
+			/* HW SGI? Ask the GIC to inject it */
+			int err;
+			err = irq_set_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq,
+						    IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING,
+						    true);
+			WARN_RATELIMIT(err, "IRQ %d", irq->host_irq);
+
+			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+			vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
+
+			continue;
+		}
+
 		if (irq->hw)
 			vgic_hw_irq_spending(vcpu, irq, is_uaccess);
 		else
@@ -290,6 +345,20 @@ void vgic_mmio_write_cpending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
 
+		if (irq->hw && vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid)) {
+			/* HW SGI? Ask the GIC to inject it */
+			int err;
+			err = irq_set_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq,
+						    IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING,
+						    false);
+			WARN_RATELIMIT(err, "IRQ %d", irq->host_irq);
+
+			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+			vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
+
+			continue;
+		}
+
 		if (irq->hw)
 			vgic_hw_irq_cpending(vcpu, irq, is_uaccess);
 		else
@@ -339,8 +408,15 @@ static void vgic_mmio_change_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_irq *irq,
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
 
-	if (irq->hw) {
+	if (irq->hw && !vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid)) {
 		vgic_hw_irq_change_active(vcpu, irq, active, !requester_vcpu);
+	} else if (irq->hw && vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid)) {
+		/*
+		 * GICv4.1 VSGI feature doesn't track an active state,
+		 * so let's not kid ourselves, there is nothing we can
+		 * do here.
+		 */
+		irq->active = false;
 	} else {
 		u32 model = vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.vgic_model;
 		u8 active_source;
@@ -514,6 +590,8 @@ void vgic_mmio_write_priority(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
 		/* Narrow the priority range to what we actually support */
 		irq->priority = (val >> (i * 8)) & GENMASK(7, 8 - VGIC_PRI_BITS);
+		if (irq->hw && vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid))
+			vgic_update_vsgi(irq);
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
 
 		vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-23 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-23 18:25 [PATCH 00/35] irqchip/gic-v4: GICv4.1 architecture support Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 01/35] KVM: arm64: vgic-v4: Move the GICv4 residency flow to be driven by vcpu_load/put Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 02/35] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Factor out wait_for_syncr primitive Marc Zyngier
2019-09-24  8:58   ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 03/35] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Allow LPI invalidation via the DirectLPI interface Marc Zyngier
2019-09-26 14:57   ` Zenghui Yu
2019-09-26 15:34     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-09-26 16:17     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-09-27  6:59       ` Zenghui Yu
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 04/35] irqchip/gic-v3: Detect GICv4.1 supporting RVPEID Marc Zyngier
2019-09-24 10:24   ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-24 10:49     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-09-24 11:00       ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-24 11:18         ` Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 05/35] irqchip/gic-v3: Add GICv4.1 VPEID size discovery Marc Zyngier
2019-09-24 10:49   ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-24 11:00     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 06/35] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Make is_v4 use a TYPER copy Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 07/35] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Kill its->ite_size and use TYPER copy instead Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 08/35] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Kill its->device_ids " Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 09/35] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add get_vlpi_map() helper Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 10/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: VPE table (aka GICR_VPROPBASER) allocation Marc Zyngier
2019-09-25 13:04   ` Zenghui Yu
2019-09-25 14:41     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-09-25 17:14       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-09-26 15:19       ` Zenghui Yu
2019-09-26 15:57         ` Marc Zyngier
2019-09-26 16:27           ` Marc Zyngier
2019-09-27  2:01             ` Zenghui Yu
2019-09-27  1:59           ` Zenghui Yu
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 11/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Implement the v4.1 flavour of VMAPP Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 12/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Don't use the VPE proxy if RVPEID is set Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 13/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Implement the v4.1 flavour of VMOVP Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 14/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb skeletal VPE irqchip Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 15/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add mask/unmask doorbell callbacks Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 16/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add VPE residency callback Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 17/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add VPE eviction callback Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 18/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add VPE INVALL callback Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 19/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Suppress per-VLPI doorbell Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 20/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Allow direct invalidation of VLPIs Marc Zyngier
2019-09-28  2:02   ` Zenghui Yu
2019-09-30  9:20     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-09-30  9:40       ` Zenghui Yu
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 21/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Advertise support v4.1 to KVM Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 22/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Map the ITS SGIR register page Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 23/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb skeletal VSGI irqchip Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 24/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add initial SGI configuration Marc Zyngier
2019-09-28  2:20   ` Zenghui Yu
2019-09-28  3:07     ` Zenghui Yu
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 25/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb mask/unmask SGI callbacks Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 26/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb get/set_irqchip_state " Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 27/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb set_vcpu_affinity " Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:25 ` [PATCH 28/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Move doorbell management to the GICv4 abstraction layer Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:26 ` [PATCH 29/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add VSGI allocation/teardown Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:26 ` [PATCH 30/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add VSGI property setup Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:26 ` [PATCH 31/35] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Eagerly vmap vPEs Marc Zyngier
2019-09-28  3:11   ` Zenghui Yu
2019-09-30  9:23     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:26 ` [PATCH 32/35] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Let doorbells be auto-enabled Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:26 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2019-09-23 18:26 ` [PATCH 34/35] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Configure SGIs as HW interrupts Marc Zyngier
2019-09-23 18:26 ` [PATCH 35/35] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Expose HW-based SGIs in debugfs Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190923182606.32100-34-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=Andrew.Murray@arm.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).