Hi,

On Thu 03 Oct 19, 22:44, Jernej Škrabec wrote:
> Dne četrtek, 03. oktober 2019 ob 22:28:46 CEST je Paul Kocialkowski 
> napisal(a):
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Thu 03 Oct 19, 07:16, Jernej Škrabec wrote:
> > > Dne četrtek, 03. oktober 2019 ob 00:06:50 CEST je Paul Kocialkowski
> > > 
> > > napisal(a):
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed 02 Oct 19, 21:35, Jernej Skrabec wrote:
> > > > > Reference index count in VE_H264_PPS should come from PPS control.
> > > > > However, this is not really important, because reference index count
> > > > > is
> > > > > in our case always overridden by that from slice header.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks for the fixup!
> > > > 
> > > > Our libva userspace and v4l2-request testing tool currently don't
> > > > provide
> > > > this, but I have a pending merge request adding it for the hantro so
> > > > it's
> > > > good to go.
> > > 
> > > Actually, I think this is just cosmetic and it would work even if it would
> > > be always 0. We always override this number in SHS2 register with
> > > VE_H264_SHS2_NUM_REF_IDX_ACTIVE_OVRD flag and recently there was a patch
> > > merged to clarify that value in slice parameters should be the one that's
> > > set on default value if override flag is not set in bitstream:
> > > https://git.linuxtv.org/media_tree.git/commit/?
> > > id=187ef7c5c78153acdce8c8714e5918b1018c710b
> > > 
> > > Well, we could always compare default and value in slice parameters, but I
> > > really don't see the benefit of doing that extra work.
> > 
> > Thanks for the detailed explanation! So I just realized that for HEVC, I
> > didn't even include the default value in PPS and only went for the
> > per-slice value. The HEVC hardware block apparently only needs the fields
> > once at slice level, and by looking at the spec, only one of the two set of
> > fields will be used.
> > 
> > So perhaps we could do the same for H.264 and only have the set of fields
> > once in the slice params, so that both codecs are consistent. Userspace can
> > just check the flag to know whether it should put the PPS default or
> > slice-specific value in the slice-specific control.
> > 
> > What do you think?
> 
> I think that there would be less confusion if only value in slice params would 
> exists. But since Philipp rather made clarification in documentation, maybe he 
> sees benefit having both values?

Actually I just caught up with the discussion from thread:
media: uapi: h264: Add num_ref_idx_active_override_flag

which explains that we need to pass the default fields for hardware that parses
the slice header itself and we need the non-default fields and flag for other
cases.

To cover the case of hardware that does slice header parsing, I guess it would
also work to use the slice-specific values in place of the pps default values
in the hardware register for that. But it feels quite confusing and a lot less
straightforward than having all the fields and the override flag exposed.

So I think I should fix HEVC support accordingly, just in case the same
situation arises for HEVC.

Cheers,

Paul

> Best regards,
> Jernej
> 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Paul
> > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > Jernej
> > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > 
> > > > Paul
> > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > 
> > > > >  drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_h264.c | 8 ++------
> > > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_h264.c
> > > > > b/drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_h264.c index
> > > > > bd848146eada..4a0e69855c7f 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_h264.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_h264.c
> > > > > @@ -364,12 +364,8 @@ static void cedrus_set_params(struct cedrus_ctx
> > > > > *ctx,
> > > > > 
> > > > >  	// picture parameters
> > > > >  	reg = 0;
> > > > > 
> > > > > -	/*
> > > > > -	 * FIXME: the kernel headers are allowing the default value to
> > > > > -	 * be passed, but the libva doesn't give us that.
> > > > > -	 */
> > > > > -	reg |= (slice->num_ref_idx_l0_active_minus1 & 0x1f) << 10;
> > > > > -	reg |= (slice->num_ref_idx_l1_active_minus1 & 0x1f) << 5;
> > > > > +	reg |= (pps->num_ref_idx_l0_default_active_minus1 & 0x1f) << 10;
> > > > > +	reg |= (pps->num_ref_idx_l1_default_active_minus1 & 0x1f) << 5;
> > > > > 
> > > > >  	reg |= (pps->weighted_bipred_idc & 0x3) << 2;
> > > > >  	if (pps->flags & V4L2_H264_PPS_FLAG_ENTROPY_CODING_MODE)
> > > > >  	
> > > > >  		reg |= VE_H264_PPS_ENTROPY_CODING_MODE;
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Paul Kocialkowski, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com