linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
To: Wei Zhao <wallyzhao@gmail.com>
Cc: vyasevich@gmail.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wally.zhao@nokia-sbell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: set ooo_okay properly for Transmit Packet Steering
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 15:35:00 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191030183500.GH4250@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFRmqq42HqX5KctcNjwyZJ4jdknLSZ1EyBqHnJQQJx211mWopw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:54:45PM +0800, Wei Zhao wrote:
> On 10/30/19, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:07:17PM -0400, Wally Zhao wrote:
> >> Unlike tcp_transmit_skb,
> >> sctp_packet_transmit does not set ooo_okay explicitly,
> >> causing unwanted Tx queue switching when multiqueue is in use;
> >
> > It is initialized to 0 by __alloc_skb() via:
> >         memset(skb, 0, offsetof(struct sk_buff, tail));
> > and never set to 1 by anyone for SCTP.
> >
> > The patch description seems off. I don't see how the unwanted Tx queue
> > switching can happen. IOW, it's not fixing it OOO packets, but
> > improving it by allowing switching on the first packet. Am I missing
> > something?
> 
> Thanks for pointing this out. You are right. This ooo_okay is default to false.
> 
> I was observing some Tx queue switching before when testing with
> iperf3 (modified to be able to set window size, for higher throughput
> with long RTT), so I thought ooo_okay was set to true somewhere else
> after allocation. Just now I did the test again, it turns out that
> iperf3 made a re-connect silently which caused the Tx queue change.

Ah, okay.

> 
> As for the improving purpose of this patch, that is not that critical
> from my side, and the patch description is not correct for this
> purpose. So I will give up this patch attempt. Thank you again for
> your time on this.

As you wish. If you don't have the time for it, ok, but the
improvement is welcomed. With a more accurate description and using
tp->flight_size instead, it should be good.

Thanks,
  Marcelo

> 
> >
> >> Tx queue switching may cause out-of-order packets.
> >> Change sctp_packet_transmit to allow Tx queue switching only for
> >> the first in flight packet, to avoid unwanted Tx queue switching.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wally Zhao <wallyzhao@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  net/sctp/output.c | 4 ++++
> >>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/net/sctp/output.c b/net/sctp/output.c
> >> index dbda7e7..5ff75cc 100644
> >> --- a/net/sctp/output.c
> >> +++ b/net/sctp/output.c
> >> @@ -626,6 +626,10 @@ int sctp_packet_transmit(struct sctp_packet *packet,
> >> gfp_t gfp)
> >>  	/* neighbour should be confirmed on successful transmission or
> >>  	 * positive error
> >>  	 */
> >> +
> >> +	/* allow switch tx queue only for the first in flight pkt */
> >> +	head->ooo_okay = asoc->outqueue.outstanding_bytes == 0;
> >
> > Considering we are talking about NIC queues here, we would have a
> > better result with tp->flight_size instead. As in, we can switch
> > queues if, for this transport, the queue is empty.
> >
> >> +
> >>  	if (tp->af_specific->sctp_xmit(head, tp) >= 0 &&
> >>  	    tp->dst_pending_confirm)
> >>  		tp->dst_pending_confirm = 0;
> >> --
> >> 1.8.3.1
> >>
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-30 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-30 16:07 [PATCH] sctp: set ooo_okay properly for Transmit Packet Steering Wally Zhao
2019-10-30 13:24 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2019-10-30 15:54   ` Wei Zhao
2019-10-30 18:35     ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner [this message]
2019-10-30 19:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-10-31  1:11   ` Wei Zhao
2019-11-04  8:46 ` [sctp] 327fecdaf3: BUG:kernel_NULL_pointer_dereference,address kernel test robot
2019-11-04 13:25   ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2019-11-04 14:14     ` Wei Zhao
2019-11-04 14:49       ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191030183500.GH4250@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    --cc=wally.zhao@nokia-sbell.com \
    --cc=wallyzhao@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).