linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: [patch V2 11/16] x86/ioperm: Share I/O bitmap if identical
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 23:03:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191111223052.603030685@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20191111220314.519933535@linutronix.de

The I/O bitmap is duplicated on fork. That's wasting memory and slows down
fork. There is no point to do so. As long as the bitmap is not modified it
can be shared between threads and processes.

Add a refcount and just share it on fork. If a task modifies the bitmap
then it has to do the duplication if and only if it is shared.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
V2: New patch
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/iobitmap.h |    5 +++++
 arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c        |   38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 arch/x86/kernel/process.c       |   39 ++++++---------------------------------
 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/iobitmap.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/iobitmap.h
@@ -2,10 +2,12 @@
 #ifndef _ASM_X86_IOBITMAP_H
 #define _ASM_X86_IOBITMAP_H
 
+#include <linux/refcount.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 
 struct io_bitmap {
 	u64			sequence;
+	refcount_t		refcnt;
 	unsigned int		io_bitmap_max;
 	union {
 		unsigned long	bits[IO_BITMAP_LONGS];
@@ -13,6 +15,9 @@ struct io_bitmap {
 	};
 };
 
+struct task_struct;
+
+void io_bitmap_share(struct task_struct *tsk);
 void io_bitmap_exit(void);
 
 void tss_update_io_bitmap(void);
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c
@@ -16,6 +16,17 @@
 
 static atomic64_t io_bitmap_sequence;
 
+void io_bitmap_share(struct task_struct *tsk)
+ {
+	/*
+	 * Take a refcount on current's bitmap. It can be used by
+	 * both tasks as long as none of them changes the bitmap.
+	 */
+	refcount_inc(&current->thread.io_bitmap->refcnt);
+	tsk->thread.io_bitmap = current->thread.io_bitmap;
+	set_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_IO_BITMAP);
+}
+
 void io_bitmap_exit(void)
 {
 	struct io_bitmap *iobm = current->thread.io_bitmap;
@@ -25,7 +36,8 @@ void io_bitmap_exit(void)
 	clear_thread_flag(TIF_IO_BITMAP);
 	tss_update_io_bitmap();
 	preempt_enable();
-	kfree(iobm);
+	if (iobm && refcount_dec_and_test(&iobm->refcnt))
+		kfree(iobm);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -59,8 +71,26 @@ long ksys_ioperm(unsigned long from, uns
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
 		memset(iobm->bits, 0xff, sizeof(iobm->bits));
+		refcount_set(&iobm->refcnt, 1);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * If the bitmap is not shared, then nothing can take a refcount as
+	 * current can obviously not fork at the same time. If it's shared
+	 * duplicate it and drop the refcount on the original one.
+	 */
+	if (refcount_read(&iobm->refcnt) > 1) {
+		iobm = kmemdup(iobm, sizeof(*iobm), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!iobm)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+		io_bitmap_exit();
 	}
 
+	/* Set the tasks io_bitmap pointer (might be the same) */
+	t->io_bitmap = iobm;
+	/* Mark it active for context switching and exit to user mode */
+	set_thread_flag(TIF_IO_BITMAP);
+
 	/*
 	 * Update the tasks bitmap. The update of the TSS bitmap happens on
 	 * exit to user mode. So this needs no protection.
@@ -88,12 +118,8 @@ long ksys_ioperm(unsigned long from, uns
 
 	iobm->io_bitmap_max = (max_long + 1) * sizeof(unsigned long);
 
-	/* Update the sequence number to force an update in switch_to() */
+	/* Increment the sequence number to force a TSS update */
 	iobm->sequence = atomic64_add_return(1, &io_bitmap_sequence);
-	/* Set the tasks io_bitmap pointer (might be the same) */
-	t->io_bitmap = iobm;
-	/* Mark it active for context switching and exit to user mode */
-	set_thread_flag(TIF_IO_BITMAP);
 
 	return 0;
 }
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -122,37 +122,13 @@ static int set_new_tls(struct task_struc
 		return do_set_thread_area_64(p, ARCH_SET_FS, tls);
 }
 
-static inline int copy_io_bitmap(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	struct io_bitmap *bm = current->thread.io_bitmap;
-
-	if (likely(!test_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_IO_BITMAP)))
-		return 0;
-
-	tsk->thread.io_bitmap = kmemdup(bm, sizeof(*bm), GFP_KERNEL);
-
-	if (!tsk->thread.io_bitmap)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	set_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_IO_BITMAP);
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static inline void free_io_bitmap(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	if (tsk->thread.io_bitmap) {
-		kfree(tsk->thread.io_bitmap);
-		tsk->thread.io_bitmap = NULL;
-	}
-}
-
 int copy_thread_tls(unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned long sp,
 		    unsigned long arg, struct task_struct *p, unsigned long tls)
 {
 	struct inactive_task_frame *frame;
 	struct fork_frame *fork_frame;
 	struct pt_regs *childregs;
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	childregs = task_pt_regs(p);
 	fork_frame = container_of(childregs, struct fork_frame, regs);
@@ -193,16 +169,13 @@ int copy_thread_tls(unsigned long clone_
 	task_user_gs(p) = get_user_gs(current_pt_regs());
 #endif
 
-	ret = copy_io_bitmap(p);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
 	/* Set a new TLS for the child thread? */
-	if (clone_flags & CLONE_SETTLS) {
+	if (clone_flags & CLONE_SETTLS)
 		ret = set_new_tls(p, tls);
-		if (ret)
-			free_io_bitmap(p);
-	}
+
+	if (!ret && unlikely(test_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_IO_BITMAP)))
+		io_bitmap_share(p);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-11 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-11 22:03 [patch V2 00/16] x86/iopl: Prevent user space from using CLI/STI with iopl(3) Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-11 22:03 ` [patch V2 01/16] x86/ptrace: Prevent truncation of bitmap size Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-12 15:34   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-11 22:03 ` [patch V2 02/16] x86/process: Unify copy_thread_tls() Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-11 22:03 ` [patch V2 03/16] x86/cpu: Unify cpu_init() Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-11 22:03 ` [patch V2 04/16] x86/tss: Fix and move VMX BUILD_BUG_ON() Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-11 22:44   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-12 15:37   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-11 22:03 ` [patch V2 05/16] x86/iopl: Cleanup include maze Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-12 15:37   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-11 22:03 ` [patch V2 06/16] x86/io: Speedup schedule out of I/O bitmap user Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-12 16:00   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-12 17:08     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-11 22:03 ` [patch V2 07/16] x86/ioperm: Move iobitmap data into a struct Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-12 16:02   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-12 17:08     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-11 22:03 ` [patch V2 08/16] x86/ioperm: Add bitmap sequence number Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-12  9:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-12  9:55     ` [patch V2 08/16] x86/ioperm: Add bitmap sequence numberc Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-12 16:08   ` [patch V2 08/16] x86/ioperm: Add bitmap sequence number Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-12 17:10     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-11 22:03 ` [patch V2 09/16] x86/ioperm: Move TSS bitmap update to exit to user work Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-12 16:16   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-12 17:20     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-12 17:41       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-12 17:46         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-11-13  8:30           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-11 22:03 ` [patch V2 10/16] x86/ioperm: Remove bitmap if all permissions dropped Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-12 17:43   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-11 22:03 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2019-11-12  7:14   ` [patch V2 11/16] x86/ioperm: Share I/O bitmap if identical Ingo Molnar
2019-11-12  7:17     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-12  7:52       ` Ingo Molnar
2019-11-12  9:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-12  9:51     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-14 11:02     ` David Laight
2019-11-14 12:39       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-14 13:09       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-14 13:22         ` David Laight
2019-11-12 18:12   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-11 22:03 ` [patch V2 12/16] selftests/x86/ioperm: Extend testing so the shared bitmap is exercised Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-11 22:03 ` [patch V2 13/16] x86/iopl: Fixup misleading comment Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-12 18:14   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-11 22:03 ` [patch V2 14/16] x86/iopl: Restrict iopl() permission scope Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-11 23:03   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-12  6:32     ` Ingo Molnar
2019-11-12  8:42   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-11-12 10:07     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-12 18:35   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-11 22:03 ` [patch V2 15/16] x86/iopl: Remove legacy IOPL option Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-12 18:37   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-12 19:40     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-11 22:03 ` [patch V2 16/16] selftests/x86/iopl: Extend test to cover IOPL emulation Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-12  7:40 ` [PATCH] x86/iopl: Factor out IO-bitmap related TSS fields into 'struct x86_io_bitmap' Ingo Molnar
2019-11-12  7:59   ` [PATCH] x86/iopl: Harmonize 'struct io_bitmap' and 'struct x86_io_bitmap' nomenclature Ingo Molnar
2019-11-12  8:11   ` [PATCH] x86/iopl: Clear up the role of the two bitmap copying fields Ingo Molnar
2019-11-12  8:15   ` [PATCH] x86/iopl: Rename <asm/iobitmap.h> to <asm/io_bitmap.h> Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191111223052.603030685@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).