From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@android.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] netfilter: Avoid assigning 'const' pointer to non-const pointer
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 23:00:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200124220008.GS11457@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgbAfG6UZYd3PY3fmh5nCE191gY76Fn_g_D8nO64mdx-A@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 09:36:54AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:25 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > Just for curiosity's sake. What does clang actually do in that case?
>
> This shouldn't necessarily be clang-specific. If the variable itself
> is 'const', it might go into a read-only section. So trying to modify
> it will quite possibly hit a SIGSEGV in user space (and in kernel
> space cause an oops).
Quite; but I worried clang would use the UB to omit the access entirely,
and therefore rob us of the well deserved crash or something.
Let me go read Nick's email tho, see what it actually does.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-24 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-23 15:33 [PATCH v2 00/10] Rework READ_ONCE() to improve codegen Will Deacon
2020-01-23 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] compiler/gcc: Emit build-time warning for GCC prior to version 4.8 Will Deacon
2020-01-23 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] netfilter: Avoid assigning 'const' pointer to non-const pointer Will Deacon
2020-01-23 19:07 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-01-24 8:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-24 17:20 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-01-27 12:04 ` David Laight
2020-01-24 17:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-01-24 22:00 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-01-27 12:21 ` David Laight
2020-01-23 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] fault_inject: Don't rely on "return value" from WRITE_ONCE() Will Deacon
2020-01-23 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] READ_ONCE: Simplify implementations of {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() Will Deacon
2020-01-23 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] READ_ONCE: Enforce atomicity for {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() memory accesses Will Deacon
2020-01-25 8:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-29 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-23 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] READ_ONCE: Drop pointer qualifiers when reading from scalar types Will Deacon
2020-01-23 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] locking/barriers: Use '__unqual_scalar_typeof' for load-acquire macros Will Deacon
2020-01-23 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] arm64: barrier: Use '__unqual_scalar_typeof' for acquire/release macros Will Deacon
2020-01-23 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] compiler/gcc: Raise minimum GCC version for kernel builds to 4.8 Will Deacon
2020-01-23 18:36 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-01-24 8:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-24 17:05 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-01-24 23:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-25 10:34 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-01-23 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] gcov: Remove old GCC 3.4 support Will Deacon
2020-01-23 18:51 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-01-28 14:56 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2020-01-23 17:07 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] Rework READ_ONCE() to improve codegen David Laight
2020-01-23 17:16 ` Will Deacon
2020-01-23 17:32 ` David Laight
2020-01-23 18:45 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-01-23 19:01 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-01-24 10:11 ` David Laight
2020-01-26 1:10 ` Qais Yousef
2020-01-27 7:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-23 17:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-01-24 8:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-24 10:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-10 9:50 ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-02-10 9:59 ` Will Deacon
2020-01-31 10:20 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200124220008.GS11457@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).