From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Static calls
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:57:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200217165714.1080cfd2@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG48ez0owFet0E43UAGd7sV9Oi0yhVpWTmy4W+Vm5+0q=74-DA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 22:10:27 +0100
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 9:52 PM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:30:23PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 04:59:35PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > With this version, I stopped trying to use text_poke_bp(), and instead
> > > > went with a different approach: if the call site destination doesn't
> > > > cross a cacheline boundary, just do an atomic write. Otherwise, keep
> > > > using the trampoline indefinitely.
> > >
> > > > - Get rid of the use of text_poke_bp(), in favor of atomic writes.
> > > > Out-of-line calls will be promoted to inline only if the call sites
> > > > don't cross cache line boundaries. [Linus/Andy]
> > >
> > > Can we perserve why text_poke_bp() didn't work? I seem to have forgotten
> > > again. The problem was poking the return address onto the stack from the
> > > int3 handler, or something along those lines?
> >
> > Right, emulating a call instruction from the #BP handler is ugly,
> > because you have to somehow grow the stack to make room for the return
> > address. Personally I liked the idea of shifting the iret frame by 16
> > bytes in the #DB entry code, but others hated it.
> >
> > So many bad-but-not-completely-unacceptable options to choose from.
>
> Silly suggestion from someone who has skimmed the thread:
>
> Wouldn't a retpoline-style trampoline solve this without needing
> memory allocations? Let the interrupt handler stash the destination in
> a percpu variable and clear IF in regs->flags. Something like:
Linus actually suggested something similar, but for ftrace, but after
implementing it, it was hard to get right, and caused havoc with
utilities like lockdep, and also shadow stacks.
See this thread:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CAHk-=wh5OpheSU8Em_Q3Hg8qw_JtoijxOdPtHru6d+5K8TWM=A@mail.gmail.com/
-- Steve
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-17 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-09 22:59 [PATCH v3 0/6] Static calls Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-09 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] compiler.h: Make __ADDRESSABLE() symbol truly unique Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-09 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] static_call: Add basic static call infrastructure Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 14:03 ` Edward Cree
2019-01-10 18:37 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-09 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] x86/static_call: Add out-of-line static call implementation Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 0:16 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-10 16:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-09 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] static_call: Add inline static call infrastructure Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-09 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/alternative: Use a single access in text_poke() where possible Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 9:32 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-10 17:20 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 17:29 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-10 17:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-01-10 17:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-01-10 17:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-01-10 18:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-01-10 18:21 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 18:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-01-11 12:10 ` Alexandre Chartre
2019-01-11 15:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-11 16:46 ` Alexandre Chartre
2019-01-11 16:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-11 17:41 ` Jason Baron
2019-01-11 17:54 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-15 11:10 ` Alexandre Chartre
2019-01-15 16:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-01-15 16:45 ` Alexandre Chartre
2019-01-11 0:59 ` hpa
2019-01-11 1:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-01-11 8:13 ` hpa
2019-01-09 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] x86/static_call: Add inline static call implementation for x86-64 Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 1:21 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] Static calls Nadav Amit
2019-01-10 16:44 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 17:32 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-10 18:18 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 19:45 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-10 20:32 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 20:48 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-10 20:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 21:47 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-10 17:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-10 20:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2019-01-10 20:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-10 20:52 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 23:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-11 0:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-01-11 1:47 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-11 15:15 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-11 15:48 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-11 16:07 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-11 17:23 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-11 19:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-11 19:17 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-11 19:23 ` hpa
2019-01-11 19:33 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-11 19:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-13 0:34 ` hpa
2019-01-13 0:36 ` hpa
2019-01-11 19:39 ` Jiri Kosina
2019-01-14 2:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2019-01-14 2:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2019-01-14 20:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-01-14 22:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2019-01-14 22:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2019-01-15 3:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-01-15 5:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2019-01-15 5:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2019-01-14 23:27 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-01-14 23:51 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-15 2:28 ` hpa
2019-01-11 20:04 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-11 20:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-11 20:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-11 20:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-11 21:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-01-11 21:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-11 21:32 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-14 12:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-11 21:22 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-11 21:23 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-11 21:25 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-11 21:36 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-11 21:41 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-11 21:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-01-11 21:59 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-11 21:56 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-12 23:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-02-17 21:10 ` Jann Horn
2020-02-17 21:57 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200217165714.1080cfd2@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=ecree@solarflare.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=julia@ni.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).