From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@gmail.com>
To: Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vpillai@digitalocean.com>
Cc: "Aubrey Li" <aubrey.intel@gmail.com>,
"Tim Chen" <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
"Julien Desfossez" <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com>,
"Nishanth Aravamudan" <naravamudan@digitalocean.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Paul Turner" <pjt@google.com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Linux List Kernel Mailing" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Dario Faggioli" <dfaggioli@suse.com>,
"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Greg Kerr" <kerrnel@google.com>, "Phil Auld" <pauld@redhat.com>,
"Valentin Schneider" <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
"Pawan Gupta" <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/19] Core scheduling v4
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:04:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200227020432.GA628749@ziqianlu-desktop.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANaguZD205ccu1V_2W-QuMRrJA9SjJ5ng1do4NCdLy8NDKKrbA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 03:51:37PM -0500, Vineeth Remanan Pillai wrote:
> On a 2sockets/16cores/32threads VM, I grouped 8 sysbench(cpu mode)
> > threads into one cgroup(cgA) and another 16 sysbench(cpu mode) threads
> > into another cgroup(cgB). cgA and cgB's cpusets are set to the same
> > socket's 8 cores/16 CPUs and cgA's cpu.shares is set to 10240 while cgB's
> > cpu.shares is set to 2(so consider cgB as noise workload and cgA as
> > the real workload).
> >
> > I had expected cgA to occupy 8 cpus(with each cpu on a different core)
>
> The expected behaviour could also be that 8 processes share 4 cores and
> 8 hw threads right? This is what we are seeing mostly
I expect the 8 cgA tasks to spread on each core, instead of occupying
4 cores/8 hw threads. If they stay on 4 cores/8 hw threads, than on the
core level, these cores' load would be much higher than other cores
which are running cgB's tasks, this doesn't look right to me.
I think the end result should be: each core has two tasks queued, one
cgA task and one cgB task(to maintain load balance on the core level).
The two tasks are queued on different hw thread, with cgA's task runs
most of the time on one thread and cgB's task being forced idle most
of the time on the other thread.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-27 2:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-30 18:33 [RFC PATCH v4 00/19] Core scheduling v4 Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-10-30 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/19] stop_machine: Fix stop_cpus_in_progress ordering Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-10-30 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/19] sched: Fix kerneldoc comment for ia64_set_curr_task Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-10-30 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/19] sched: Wrap rq::lock access Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-10-30 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/19] sched/{rt,deadline}: Fix set_next_task vs pick_next_task Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-10-30 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/19] sched: Add task_struct pointer to sched_class::set_curr_task Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-10-30 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/19] sched/fair: Export newidle_balance() Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-10-30 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/19] sched: Allow put_prev_task() to drop rq->lock Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-10-30 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/19] sched: Rework pick_next_task() slow-path Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-10-30 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/19] sched: Introduce sched_class::pick_task() Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-10-30 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/19] sched: Core-wide rq->lock Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-10-30 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/19] sched: Basic tracking of matching tasks Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-10-30 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/19] sched: A quick and dirty cgroup tagging interface Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-10-30 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/19] sched: Add core wide task selection and scheduling Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-10-30 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/19] sched/fair: Add a few assertions Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-10-30 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/19] sched: Trivial forced-newidle balancer Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-10-30 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/19] sched: Debug bits Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-10-30 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 17/19] sched/fair: wrapper for cfs_rq->min_vruntime Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-10-30 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 18/19] sched/fair: core wide vruntime comparison Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-10-30 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 19/19] sched/fair : Wake up forced idle siblings if needed Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-10-31 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH v4 00/19] Core scheduling v4 Li, Aubrey
2019-11-01 11:33 ` Li, Aubrey
2019-11-08 3:20 ` Li, Aubrey
2019-10-31 18:42 ` Phil Auld
2019-11-01 14:03 ` Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-11-01 16:35 ` Greg Kerr
2019-11-01 18:07 ` Dario Faggioli
2019-11-12 1:45 ` Dario Faggioli
2019-11-13 17:16 ` Tim Chen
2020-01-02 2:28 ` Aubrey Li
2020-01-10 23:19 ` Tim Chen
2019-11-11 19:10 ` Tim Chen
2020-01-14 1:12 ` Tim Chen
2020-01-14 15:40 ` Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2020-01-15 3:43 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-01-15 19:33 ` Tim Chen
2020-01-16 1:45 ` Aubrey Li
2020-01-17 16:00 ` Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2020-01-22 18:04 ` Gruza, Agata
2020-01-28 2:40 ` Dario Faggioli
[not found] ` <CANaguZDDpzrzdTmvjXvCmV2c+wBt6mXWSz4Vn-LJ-onc_Oj=yw@mail.gmail.com>
2020-02-01 15:31 ` Dario Faggioli
2020-02-06 0:28 ` Tim Chen
2020-02-06 22:37 ` Julien Desfossez
2020-02-12 23:07 ` Julien Desfossez
2020-02-13 18:37 ` Tim Chen
2020-02-14 6:10 ` Aubrey Li
[not found] ` <CANaguZC40mDHfL1H_9AA7H8cyd028t9PQVRqQ3kB4ha8R7hhqg@mail.gmail.com>
2020-02-15 6:01 ` Aubrey Li
[not found] ` <CANaguZBj_x_2+9KwbHCQScsmraC_mHdQB6uRqMTYMmvhBYfv2Q@mail.gmail.com>
2020-02-21 23:20 ` Julien Desfossez
2020-03-17 0:55 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-03-17 19:07 ` Tim Chen
2020-03-17 20:18 ` Tim Chen
2020-03-18 1:10 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-03-17 21:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-17 21:58 ` Tim Chen
2020-03-18 1:03 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-03-18 2:30 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-03-18 0:52 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-03-18 11:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-19 1:54 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-02-25 3:44 ` Aaron Lu
2020-02-25 5:32 ` Aubrey Li
2020-02-25 7:34 ` Aaron Lu
2020-02-25 10:40 ` Aubrey Li
2020-02-25 11:21 ` Aaron Lu
2020-02-25 13:41 ` Aubrey Li
[not found] ` <CANaguZD205ccu1V_2W-QuMRrJA9SjJ5ng1do4NCdLy8NDKKrbA@mail.gmail.com>
2020-02-26 3:13 ` Aaron Lu
2020-02-26 7:21 ` Aubrey Li
[not found] ` <CANaguZDQZg-Z6aNpeLcjQ-cGm3X8CQOkZ_hnJNUyqDRM=yVDFQ@mail.gmail.com>
2020-02-27 4:45 ` Aubrey Li
2020-02-28 23:55 ` Tim Chen
2020-03-03 14:59 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-03-03 23:54 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-03-05 4:33 ` Aaron Lu
2020-03-05 6:10 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-03-05 8:52 ` Aaron Lu
2020-02-27 2:04 ` Aaron Lu [this message]
2020-02-27 14:10 ` Phil Auld
2020-02-27 14:37 ` Aubrey Li
2020-02-28 2:54 ` Aaron Lu
2020-03-05 13:45 ` Aubrey Li
2020-03-06 2:41 ` Aaron Lu
2020-03-06 18:06 ` Tim Chen
2020-03-06 18:33 ` Phil Auld
2020-03-06 21:44 ` Tim Chen
2020-03-07 3:13 ` Aaron Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200227020432.GA628749@ziqianlu-desktop.localdomain \
--to=aaron.lwe@gmail.com \
--cc=aubrey.intel@gmail.com \
--cc=dfaggioli@suse.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jdesfossez@digitalocean.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kerrnel@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=naravamudan@digitalocean.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vpillai@digitalocean.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).